• Fontasia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How are you supposed to enjoy the music of Civilisation 7 without knowing The Odyssey?

    On a similar note, you’d think the guy on the right would counter with Beowulf

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      I learned what it is when I played oddworld: abe’s oddysey (and as a bonus I appreciated the deliberate misspelling to insert the word “odd” into the title, which they did again in the sequel, abe’s exodus)

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Meanwhile on tiktok British people are apparently mad at Americans for not knowing or caring about Robbie Williams

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    instead we studied useful things

    Have you ever seen any British television quiz game shows? The amount of world geography and history most contestants seem to know is abismal, makes me scratch my head and seriously wonder what many of these people are doing there, in a game show about knowledge. What are they even doing there, in the delusion that they have a shot.

    “What is the capital of Denmark?”
    “Erm… pass.”

    This person’s comment is just another drop in the bucket in the sorry state of things.

  • Master@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Its not even that great of a mini van. You can get better for cheaper!

  • Seeker of Carcosa@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Liam’s a tool. UK schools absolutely do teach the Odyssey, and have done so at least as far back as my youth.

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      most of the time someone says something wasnt taught in school its because that person straight up didnt pay attention in class

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I suspect there is significant overlap between the kids who were complaining in math class that what they were learning was useless along with the adults who claim math class didn’t teach them “how to do taxes”. (As if you do anything other than fill out a form, anyways.)

    • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Mine didn’t. We did Buddy, The Crucible, Animal Farm and Shakespeare from what I remember. First I heard of the Odyssey was when I was 19 and DW did a retelling of it on Arthur. When I saw a copy of the story in the shop I worked at, I got it so I could read the actual story.

      • Seeker of Carcosa@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Were you not aware of it at any point? I don’t necessarily mean as part of the GCSE curriculum. I’ve been aware of the Odyssey and the Iliad from the “Ancient Greeks” part of our primary school curriculum back in year 4. Of course we weren’t analysing texts, but I’d expect any ten year old to be capable of rattling off some major plot points like blinding Polyphemus, or sailors plugging their ears with wax against the sirens and tying Odysseus to the mast.

        • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Nope, I don’t think I’d ever heard of it prior to the Arthur version.

          We did the fall of Icarus in Year 3. My little sister learned Theseus and the Minotaur when she was around the same age, which is how I knew about it. Other than that, I don’t remember studying Ancient Greek anything, not even Heracles. Your school was obviously better than mine.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I’m in Canada.
    I wasn’t taught anything about the Odyssey or Iliad
    But I at least know that they’re ancient and Greek.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have to admit that I have not read the Illias or the Odyssey in school, either. We were made read books in school intendet to make children shy away from books, so they won’t touch any of them after school ever again.

    Luckily I had read loads of good books by that time, so I knew that only a few are as horrible as the ones they made us read in school.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It does feel a lot like that, doesn’t it? Why else would the Bronte sisters be on the curriculum if not to snuff out any interest in literature?

      • kronisk @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Only boring kids would find Wuthering Heights & Jane Eyre boring. Both books would be excellent choices in any curriculum. If you wanna talk boring early 19th century authors, Jane Austen is the name you’re looking for.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It could be worse. We read Brecht and Kafka. Several works of them. I’ve never encountered worse waste of paper and ink than those idiots. And the rest was not much better.

        • kronisk @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Just because it was wasted on you doesn’t mean it’s a bad idea, Kafka’s short stories especially (Die Verwandlung, Ein Landarzt etc) are accessible for teenagers and a good gateway drug to get interested in other things. Which is really important for kids that don’t have natural access to literature at home.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sorry, but I experienced “Die Verwandlung” as written diarrhea of a person with severe mental problems. “Der Prozess” didn’t improve my opition of him, either.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There are basic versions of these stories with big drawings, mostly made for kids. Basically manga. When i was a kid(in Greece), 35 years ago, i had this

      https://www.stratikis.gr/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/iliada-nea.jpg

      This is Iliad and it was cooler than Odyssey. Badass dudes with almost divine powers fighting other dudes and entire armies on their own, while Gods are taking sides and fucking things up. Isnt that shonen.

      Odyssey’s ending was cool though, even if it was a bit sad.

      • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The Illiad was like the ancient Greek Bible because it was used to provide behavioural guidelines and views common to all Greeks. It was a text central to any Greek’s education. How does a leader act? Read the Illiad. How are battles waged? Read the Illiad. What is the relation between humans and gods? Read the Illiad.

        Alexander the Great was known to carry a copy of the Illiad with him at all times, and many philosophers routinely used excerpts from it to illustrate their points. And people would reference it like we reference things from the Bible in the west (Judas, turn water into wine, cross to bear, turn the other cheek etc)

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Iliad was not a religious text(or even a text for many centuries). It was just a story of a dude trying to get back home.

      • Tin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know you know this and likely just mistyped, but for clarity, the Iliad is about the war itself. The Odyssey is about the dude trying to get back home.

        They weren’t religious texts per se, but they were certainly cultural touchstones which contain important lessons about the human condition, death, love, and what’s truly important in life. They would fill a role similar to histories in the Old Testament, probably, like the book of Ruth.

        • NIB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          You are right, i wrote a comment about iliad before and mistyped iliad here too. And you are right, it was a cultural touch stone for ancient Greece.

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    As an American, I am going to dine on this single example as if it disproves the idea that we are insular and provincial hicks for the next decade.

        • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          it’s /s because someone could’ve implied that i consider americans and brits as the winners in this competition, when in fact, the only competition they’re winning is the one for the most villanous politic actions. USA is a leaéer here at the first glance, but brits literally created USA, so that kinda makes all of the USA villainy into a subset of the british one

          edit: i was wrong, the best villains are the french, bc William the Conquerror is the reason brits exist, and therefore also the reason usa does

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          As a layman, i believe you have a stronger private school presence, which tend to specialize in order to differentiate. But I might be wrong because I have limited information on the topic of British education.

          • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            20 hours ago

            We have a strong private school presence, yes. Trouble is it leads to privilege and people get on in life not cause they’re clever, but cause they wear the right school tie.

            • lath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              59 minutes ago

              People often choose the easier path, which in this case means choosing status over knowledge.

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    201
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s wild that the U.K. doesn’t teach the Odyssey, I thought their whole thing was stealing other peoples’ culture and pretending they owned it now.

    • Lemming421@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      ·
      2 days ago

      Shakespeare invented literature, so clearly there’s no value in teaching anything from before him…

    • wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I did study it at school but had to take Classical Civilisation for one of my GCSE options. Our default in English Literature was a Shakespeare work as previously mentioned (Merchant of Venice for me). I also recall studying An Inspector Calls?

    • ScrollerBall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well Greece wasn’t ever a British colony, so they didn’t have as many opportunities to steal artifacts and culture as they did with, say, Egypt or India

    • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just looked it up, the Odyssey can be taught in the UK but it is rarely chosen because Shakespeare is easier to teach and students who pick Shakespeare get better grades on average.

        • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          In the UK secondary students study 3 bits of literature for the exam, modern (20th century+), victorian and classical which is everything before then, I think that’s how it works but that’s just from memory

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        We don’t like to brag about it but we fought the Brits in the War of 1812, one of the things we took from England was Greek literature. In turn, we Americans lost the definition of jams vs jelly and the superior spelling of “colour”.

        • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I rebel against this fact by being American and using the spelling of “Grey” for the color, autocorrect be damned.

      • fakeaustinfloyd@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Went to a mediocre high school in the US, and I had an English/writing course where the only materials were the Aeneid, Illiad, Odyssey, and Mythology by Edith Hamilton.

        • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That seems above average, but I don’t have too much to compare it to. I read all of this when I took Latin as my language classes. And the odyssey for fun.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is what we did as well, in AP English. We also did Beowulf. We also had to read the first fucking Harry Potter book because the teacher liked Harry Potter. Imagine a group of the highest achieving 17 and 18 year olds out of 600 students their age writing papers about a book written for 10 year olds.

          Such a waste of time. We got college credit for this bullshit. I’m still mad about it.

          • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            I feel like there’s a way to do it that doesn’t suck - an examination of the book WRT the hero’s journey, picking out elements borrowed from English literary tradition to see how they’re deployed v. original texts, etc.

            Real talk though, I feel it comes from a place of not knowing how to appeal to young people. I ran into the very same thing once when asked about course ideas for first year students coming directly from high school. I had no idea (still don’t) what would appeal to kids, so I thought a course that used Harry Potter as a keystone text (everybody being familiar, using it as a bridge to more traditional lit) could work. But as I said the words I knew 18 year old me would’ve hated that, sooo…

    • casmael@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      ……………I did the odyssey at various points man I think the guy in the tweet is just Polyphemus or smthn like ‘I don’t know who this nobody guy is, ain’t never heard of no odyssey before bro’