• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    As with most things in the modern world that have gone to shit. It is not the monetization scheme in of itself that is the issue. It is the never ending desire for more profit this quarter than last forever.

    If it was acceptable to stop trying to make even more once the cost to operate is covered and some healthy profit is made predictably then a lot less people would have issues. And enshitification would slow down.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    „I don’t want to watch ads and I want everything to be free.”

    My brother in christ, this is not how services work.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Free-at-point-of-service is a common feature of amenities provided by countries with socialist economies.

      But they only work when the economy is actively managed. If you’re just pumping cash into a big banking machine and telling people to grab for it, you’re not incentivizing any particular economic activity. You’re just encouraging entrepreneurs to get particularly good at snatching money out of the air and elbowing one another in the face.

        • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Companies don’t need to make infinite money. That’s just a weird incentive that modern corporations seem to be chasing and burning everything down around them to achieve.

        • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Nah, they have enough money. They won capitalism. Billions in profit. Fuck advertisements. Directly support the creators in your life.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t care that enhanced Bitrate is premium only. I do care that you still need to click “advanced resolution settings” to access this even for premium users on mobile.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    They finally shut off my premium account in Argentina for $3 and now I’ve been blasted with ads so much it’s unbearable. Like 3 ads every 3 mins pretty much.

    Maybe I can try again in another country but I’m pretty sure they’re wise to it and demand a card used be of the same country too.

    It’s fine on my phone but on the tvs where I mostly consume it’s hell on earth!

    God damn YouTube. Why do we like it so much.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Like 3 ads every 3 mins pretty much.

      It’s crazy on both ends of the pipeline. Like, if I’m an advertiser, I want my content to be relatively exclusive. I don’t want to be the twelfth ad you see in an hour. If I’m a consumer, I want a continuous uninterrupted stream of media. I don’t want a service that repeatedly cuts out, spams me with some volume-adjusted bullshit, and then cuts back in again seemingly at random.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        Yeah I honestly don’t mind a short ad in between videos like the old days. But this shit right now is horrible, forcing people on to premium. YouTube don’t care about the creators they just want subs.

      • Roopappy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a great product. It is thanklessly maintained by a single developer who is constantly fighting Youtube changes to break it. If you do use it and like it, and you can afford it, please consider a few bucks a month via patreon to keep it alive.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It is thanklessly maintained by a single developer

          A lot of these services are just passion projects by odd individual developers who create something for themselves and then share it with the rest of the world.

          Github is great for this kind of spontaneous innovation. But it doesn’t do a good job of organizing communities at large. Why have six different “YouTube cleanup service” alternatives when you could have a single collaborative team working towards the same end-goal? Why are people constantly trying to “fix” YouTube when what we really seem to want is an alternative media host?

    • PixellatedDave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I am seriously thinking of cobbling together a cheap pc just to plug into my TV to watch things like YouTube without the ads.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I know right. I have Apple TV because it’s awesome and doesn’t have Ads everywhere like Google and fire tv.

        I’m thinking an android tablet with revanced or similar and casting to the tv…

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          60 minutes ago

          Casting on ReVanced will still have ads, because the ads are baked into the cast feature. The ad removal only works for the app itself.

          • ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m not sure if it counts as an AD but seems like an AD, many many moons ago (I think when Apple TV+ was introduced), they changed the “home screen” with the apps in your Apple TV to an Apple TV+ one with their content (and some linked from other platforms).

            The apps view still exists but now the “home” button gets you to the Apple TV+ one unless you click it again from there (unless you accidentally scrolled a bit and the button) or double click it to open the menu with the recently opened apps.

            • horse@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              You can change the home button behaviour in the settings to take you to the app view.

    • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You can usually pay a radom guy in any latin American country who makes a business sharing family accounts for netflix etc. or just get ublock origin.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve heard there’s too many issues and they have to keep one step ahead of YouTube all the time and it’s getting difficult. Plus, can’t use that on TV

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s the world’s medium length video platform. If there’s an indie creator that’s good he’s there. Of course we like the whole world’s content that’s fed to us by an incredibly sophisticated algorithm.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The 1080p non-premium looks like shit, not better than 720p. I think they reduced the Bitrate a lot and premium restors the original Bitrate.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I see this recommendation all the time. It frustrates me. I’m in favor of blocking ads and modding clients and whatever it takes to optimize one’s experience, but the majority - by far - of my YouTube experience takes place on my TV. I can’t do much to control it (pihole and other DNS solutions don’t work on YouTube since their ads are hosted in the same servers as their videos).

      I could perform various modifications to the operating system of my TV, and trust me it’s tempting for a lot of reasons, but it was a very expensive (by my standards) TV so I want to at least wait until the warranty expires until I start experimenting.

      I could also use something hooked up to my TV and mod that, which is my favorite idea, but my wife likes the interface as it is. It’s an LGTV with the … Sigh … “Magic” remote, which I absolutely hate, but I don’t want to take it away from her. It seems like that interface, especially the “magic” cursor, would be hard to replicate. I’d prefer not to go through the tedium of having two different systems.

      Especially because we also have a console hooked up and no solution I’ve found so far has provided a simple way of switching between HDMI sources without running a disgusting number of cables. I did recently order a new receiver, so hopefully that helps with the multiple origins issue.

      Obviously this is very much a a first world problem, and I apologize for my privilege, I just wanted to point out that uBO (or other software based solutions) aren’t always the solution.

      • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I recently set up dev mode on my LG TV and installed a patched version of YouTube with ad block and sponsor block. I don’t think this voids warranty.

        If there’s interest I could look up the instructions I used (I’m traveling right now).

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Thanks for bringing this up, because it frustrates me as well. Most of the time I’m watching on a TV, and there’s no way to block YT ads on a TV. The people I share my house with aren’t technical and will watch YouTube even with ads. So to keep them out of my house I pay for YT premium.

        Suggesting that people just do something technical and janky to block ads isn’t a solution for me, not because I can’t do it, but because there’s no way my family will do it.

        • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I think there are ways, will likely vary by TV brand. I’ve set it up for my LG TV at home, it’s better than premium.

          Edit: to clarify, I didn’t set up uBlock, I set up the TV with a patched TY app that has ad block and sponsor block. The latter makes it better than premium.

          Oh and I can remove shorts.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        LG AI Voice Remote?! That’s a huge no from me dawg hahaha

        All of my screens just have computers hooked up to them, controlled by wireless keyboards with built-in touchpads. Adblocking on everything!

      • velxundussa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Even if you have a device connected to your TV to block ads when you’re using Youtube, nothing prevents her from using the TV OS when she does.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If your wife wants her familiar interface with ads, then she made the choice that you’re watching ads on YouTube on your TV.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I agree. Once my warranty expires or I get brave enough to tinker with the OS hopefully the “ads” part will no longer be relevant.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I totally get that, I have a few suggestions since I’ve been in the same situation for years and have recently improved it.

        Our Yamaha stereo takes many HDMI inputs, and has a single TV output, so the TV never needs to change inputs. It’s quite easy and quick on the Yamaha.

        I bought a Raspberry Pi 500 for ~$100 US and am loving it. I think it could use a speed upgrade (I hear the SD card will do it). Of course it’s mouse and keyboard, but we only use it for Netflix, YouTube, etc, so it was easy to make shortcuts and get a small/nice living room keyboard/mouse combo.

        It’s led to zero ads, and the household discussion was like “would you trade some ease of use to not see this stupid ad?” And we both agreed that it’s worth it. So far it’s been really nice.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Thank you for the recommendation! I have, at this point, probably five forms of HDMI splitters, including at least two receivers (though admittedly no stereos). Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to get any of them working with the TV. I think, though I can’t confirm, that HDCP is the problem. The best I’ve managed to do is a multitude of sources plugged into the the splitter, but only two of them working; specifically my (original) switch and (also original) Steam Deck seem to be pretty recalcitrant.

          I’m hoping the problem is the splitter / receiver. The new one, which promises HDCP compatibility, is set to arrive in four days. My fingers are metaphorically crossed. I’ve already replaced everything else but the consoles, so the next troubleshooting step, replacing the consoles, would be much more expensive.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Browbeating people into buying services continues to be unpopular, film at 11.

  • Danitos@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Don’t assume Google et al. will ever consider enough people buy their subscription. There’s never enough money for these people.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A company isn’t successful in hyper capitalism unless they are accelerating the growth of their profits every year. They have to sell more products to existing users, acquire new paid users, charge more for their existing products, or they’re considered unsuccessful. The model literally assumes a constant infinite exponential growth of the human race where success can only be achieved if every human alive is paying for every product offering possible, buying every upsell and microtransaction, freely giving their data to be sold so that more useless products can be created at minimum cost and sold at maximum price. But also hyper capitalism lobbies for less benefits, lower pay, etc. It inevitably collapses into neo-feudalism or just slavery

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It is because it includes YouTube Music. A really crappy Spotify clone that nobody asked for.

      • Sabin10@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I use both and find yt music is far better for discovering new music and artists and I love that it can play music from YouTube video as well. Everything else about it is worse though.

        • Pechente@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah that I think is the most upsetting part to me. Replace a perfectly fine product with a half baked one.

      • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        For some magical reason, YouTube music has less AI music than Spotify.

        The playlists are significantly worse, but I haven’t really heard any AI Christmas music that has infested Spotify.

      • Baguette@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I unironically use ytmusic more than spotify because finding niche artists is a lot more easier, which is basically the entirety of edm and its many subgenres.

        I use revanced though because I dont like google that much

      • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If you watch 43 videos per day on every day, yes…

        Some of us go to work or school or whatever and can’t therefore do that every single day, especially not when the videos are longer…

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Google asking me for €13 a month? Their empire is built upon selling user data. Fuckers should be paying us.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And if you’re a content creator, you can opt in to allow your content to be used by AI… Without compensation. 🤡

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        At least that’s opt-in, unlike them using your Wi-Fi SSID to fine tune their location settings. Not only was that opt-out but you had to change your router settings (either change your SSID, which isn’t hard but shouldn’t be required, or hide your network, which alienated guests when mobile data wasn’t so ever present). I don’t even know if there’s still a (simple) way out.

        But yes. The option you describe is clearly ridiculous.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The funny thing is, I’m nearly certain that it’s opt-in for their benefit (i.e. legal reasons) and not because it benefits the content creator, because it really doesn’t benefit the content creator at all! “Here’s my work. Do what you like with it, and don’t worry about paying.”.

  • bokherif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I was happy to pay for youtube as a service until they broke the shit out of their algorithms and started shoving ads to my face in premium. Did a chargeback and got my money back. Fuck these monkeys.

      • bokherif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        14 hours ago

        So far so good. The fuckers at youtube support acknowledged serving ads to me even with my premium membership, so they can suck a big fat dick.

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I got the 2 month free trial recently and have yet to see an ad with it. Don’t plan on continuing the service if I do see one.

      • bokherif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Watch out for the “video suggestions” in your home feed with the title “introducing ….” These are product placements they make even with the premium subscription. I HATE ads so I pulled the plug.

    • scaramobo@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Do you use VLC to play the downloaded YT videos from yt-dl or is there some method to stream directly from a given YT url with VLC?

      • Golden Lox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        i beleive you can open a yt vid straight into vlc, not sure on the specifics of how its done tho sorry

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    17 hours ago

    People can’t afford yet another monthly bill.

    It’s like walking in Trador Joes for snacks. Oh, hey, this is only $3! And look, this is only $5! Get to checkout: $130 please.

    Seriously, that’s how this nickel and dime subscription crap works.

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This has been a thing for a while now, hasn’t it? I remember trying to watch the Noseferatu trailer a few months ago and seeing how shit it looked. Tried to up the quality only to see that it was paywalled

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      trailer

      I mean, that’s an advertisement. I feel like if you’re going to watch an ad, that the company trying to sell the product should find a way to have the ad in full quality themselves.

      It looks like the official website does use YouTube, though.

        • konalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Personal experience, but I feel like it has. Especially on videos with a lot of still frames like 3blue1brown, you can see the still images become slightly better quality after all the animations stopped. I noticed a few months ago and saw 1080p premium as an option.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ve just seen it for the first time now. Might be because I’m situated in Europe? Or because I mostly don’t give a damn about the pixel count.