• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is Apple Maps.

    Apple Maps doesn’t just recommend the fastest routes, it also appears to push the most popular routes as alternatives.

    Here is the San Francisco area to LA in iOS 18. The longer route might seem insane if you’re not familiar with the drive, but that longer route is much prettier, and a lot of people intentionally drive in the coastal road for the views.

    Edit: Weird. Lemmy isn’t loading the picture for me. All in all, this is a map of I5 to LA vs the Hyw 101 to LA. I5 is 2 hours faster, but it’s a long brown valley, it smells like cow shit, and you’re bombarded with homemade MAGA signs for several hours. It’s a drive of hate, farts, and truck stop food. 101 longer, but it’s recommended for redwoods forests and cute little beach towns.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      California is ridiculous. I’m from San Francisco, was visiting LA and someone asked me where I lived. I pointed to 101 and said, turn left on that road and keep going for 8 hours.

      Edit: sorry, “the 101”. When in Rome, etc

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is. Apple Maps recommends a combo of the fastest and most popular routes. Sometimes the popular routes are shown as options because they’re nicer.

      This goes through Bend Oregon, home of the last Blockbuster on Earth. That’s a solid recommendation IMHO.

  • Yorick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can they add an option to show roads with more twist for us riding a motorbike? I’d love to road trip without having to look too closely at the map for nice roads.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    What I want is specifically “no left turns.” Because that could actually save me time. “Fewer 🚦s” and “no dangerous instructions” would also be good.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        How come it tried to send me to make a left onto a major thoroughfare from a tiny side street rather than the major one with a controlled left arrow (a blessed rarity in my city) a few blocks away? Yeah maybe someone did it and scraped a few seconds off their time because they got lucky with the cross traffic, but someone who doesn’t know the area is gonna get tboned.

        • Carlo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I used to live in GA, and there was a one-way street that google maps was constantly telling me to turn the wrong direction onto. It really bugs me that I switched to Waze because it was better than google maps, then google just bought them. Long past time to bring antitrust suits against big tech. At least we have an FTC chair at the moment who’s trying to make some progress.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t want fastest. I want least stressful. No left turns without a traffic light. No really short merges. And if it could find a way to route all the chaotic idiots along some other road, that would be perfect.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Waze likes to pull this sort of dumb shit all the time.

          Like yeah, maybe it’d save me a minute or two but I’d rather wait to take a left turn at a protected left turn light than try to cross 3 lanes of opposite traffic from some obscure side street.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh man, I’d love the 'no dangerous interactions ’ one. Just today, the map tried to have me cross a busy 4 lane street at an uncontrolled intersection. Thankfully construction rerouted me and I was able turn into the parking lot much easier than crossing

  • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 months ago

    They always seem to force alternative routes regardless whether there are any.

    I regularly see “alternatives” which are just taking a turn, doing a 180 in a roundabout and reentering the same route as before. Because why wouldn’t I just waste 10 mins just for fun?

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Except they never display the real alternatives when they DO exist! Often I’ll be driving in an area I know well, and there will be a crash or roadwork or something and Google will say “welp, better just add 30 minutes to your 30 minute commute” and I’m like “nah fam there’s a whole other road”

      I dunno how they can consistently fuck up that bad.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think a bunch of municipalities got butt hurt at them for routing traffic through their cities. It definitely used to offer way better and more alternatives. Now it’s absolute shit and I have to eyeball it all the time to see if there’s a better route.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      The best alternatives are the ones you find zooming into the map. The software knows it can’t recommend anybody take them because they’ll immediately become slower than the main routes.

      Also never seen the roundabout 180

      • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve never had the roundabout one either. But I do often get ones where I’m on a rural highway and it will give an alternative route to exit the highway, take this long twisting road that dumps me back on the highway ahead of me, adding a needless 40 minutes. Haha.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh wow, it only has me exit to save 5(+) minutes. And thank goodness for that if I’m in an unfamiliar place.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also never seen the roundabout 180

        Actually had it a couple of times. It has to be a bug but it’s been happening for a while now…

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have the opposite problem where I know there are better alternative routes but google refuses to acknowledge them.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I miss the good old days where u could click and drag the line to a route that looked better and see if it actually would work.

  • Hannes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is that a regional setting? Never saw “fewer turns” as an option in my app. Only saw “most environmental” when it takes a shorter router even though it’s slower

    • konalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve never seen “most environmental” or “fewer turns”. We get “fewer toll roads” and sometimes “avoids traffic” during rush hour

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    User: “Please give me the three fastest routes, with each answer weighted by different criteria”

    Computer: “Okay, here you go.”

    User: “Two of these are slower than the third, you stupid piece of shit, I hate you.”

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    A couple weeks ago I had to travel for work and I picked the longer one because I got paid for more miles and it meant I would get back right at the end of the day so I wouldn’t have to do anything else that afternoon. Also on that 2 hour drive I think I saw 5-6 cars for the first 3/4 of it which was pretty great.

    • consumptionone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m surprised that works. At my job they make us put in the origin and destination and will only pay the mileage for the shortest route.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m guessing they have a job like mine, where a driving trip is a relatively rare occurrence and micromanaging the travel isn’t worth it to mitigate the risk of paying out a little more.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fewer turns? I am almost positive there are two sections of switchbacks across two mountain passes in that ‘alternate’ route.

  • RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s an option!? I get severely motion sick in cars and I’d love those easier roads