• Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    So nobody is going to talk about how he said “without the intent to fertilize an embryo” and not “fertilize an egg”? You can’t fertilize an embryo lmao

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It shall be unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material

    Genetic Material is DNA. Dry skin falling off is technically discharging genetic material. As is bleeding…

    Technically a woman would be grossly violating this with every period… or by giving birth.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

      Did you miss this?

  • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    In this thread:

    A lot of men who didn’t read the article and didn’t got the satirical part of the act.

    And given the last political polemic, I’m pretty sure these “men” are misrepresenting the article on purpose.

    • JB33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes, it’s proposed to show how dumb the “life begins at conception idea” is. Blackmon doesn’t actually want this to pass

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Read the article.

      "In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

          • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 days ago

            "In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

            This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

            You read this part and didn’t get it?

                • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I guess Mississippi isn’t the first place I assumed would joke about banning masturbation 5 days into Trump Land.

            • mechoman444@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The roll of a man during the pregnancy is irrelevant. Because a man can’t get pregnant.

              Also a man is not in charge of a pregnant woman’s body and therefore cannot make choices for her body.

              What this bill will do is allow for men to make medical decisions for women without their consent.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I want to believe this is a satirical bill meant to bring attention to how absurd a lot of other bills are, but it is Mississippi. And with how things are going these past several years, it’s becoming harder and harder to tell at face value if something is an Onion or not.

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Here’s to the land you’ve torn out the heart of/

      Mississippi find yourself another country to be part of/

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.

    Then you have the wrong job as a representative.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d say he is perfect for the role and he is sure to raise through the ranks of american politics at a rapid pace.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    🤣
    SECTION 1.
    (1) This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Contraception Begins at Erection Act.”

    (2) It shall be unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo.

    (3) Upon conviction of a violation of this section, a person shall be fined:
    ( a ) One Thousand Dollars ($1000.00) for a first offense;
    ( b ) Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00) for a second offense; and
    ( c ) Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for a third or subsequent offense.

    (4) This section shall not apply to the discharge of genetic material:
    ( a ) Donated or sold to a facility for the purpose of future procedures to fertilize an embryo; and
    ( b ) Discharged with the use of a contraceptive or contraceptive method intended to prevent fertilization of an embryo.

    SECTION 2.
    This act shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2025

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I know its Mississippi but this guy has to realize this targets women with a bias. Men: “Don’t masturbate or have sex for fun!”… Damn that sucks… Women: “Don’t masturbate or have sex for fun!.. oh and don’t ever release an egg again”. Wait I cant exist as a woman pre menopausal? Nope

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Unfortunately, since their joke is badly written, it might be interpreted has you said. Yet, please notice, with the title of this law ( “Contraception Begins at Erection Act” ) that it is targeting was supposed to target men.

          • A_A@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yes it’s fun to look at this joke in different ways and to think of how it could be written in much better ways.

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That and I would worry that if people took it too seriously, it could lead to a lot more rape.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Does no one read the article? He literally did this because it shifts the focus from the woman’s role in abortion to men’s

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          They read it, but they still don’t get it. It’s frustrating having to explain every tiny bit of nuance to them though. Glad you felt inclined. Lol

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            We got it just fine. You are just acting way to stiff to even communicate, joke, or discuss. Why bother going to the comment section if you don’t want to read why their joking law has holes in it.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      "In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    10k just be be able to jerk it 3 times? This guy is a loser. I’ll jerk it all day for free. He can’t charge me a fee

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      "In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

      Did you miss this?

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s a stunt to highlight how we only discuss the woman’s role in abortion and how most anti-abortion laws are anti-woman. Was this not clear? Im asking this seriously because so many seem to be missing this here.

          • pixelscript@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s not clear at all, no.

            Is this proposal patently ridiculous? Yes. Do I believe there’s at least one legislator in Mississippi who unironically believes in this bill exactly as written, and is playing this completely straight? Considering all that’s happened so far, why not?

            Satire doesn’t work when the obvious hyperbolic nonsense is within actual expected behavior of the satirized.

            I won’t claim one way or the other that this is or is not satire. I don’t know who this legislator is and I don’t really care. But no, with the whole article you’re pasting everywhere in this thread as my only context clue, I certainly didn’t find enough evidence to be convinced he doesn’t actually believe this.

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    (4) This section shall not apply to the discharge of genetic material: … ( b ) Discharged with the use of a contraceptive or contraceptive method intended to prevent fertilization of an embryo.

    So basically it’s illegal to do so without the intent to fertilize an embryo… unless doing it as part of a contraceptive method? Isn’t abstinence - e.g. not having sex - a legitimate method?.. wouldn’t masturbation be a way to manage abstinence?

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Did you read the article? The guy is doing this to highlight the fact that the woman’s role in abortion is always focused on

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    (a) Donated or sold to a facility for the purpose of future procedures to fertilize an embryo;

    This means it’s legal to pull out and fill a jar to donate to such a facility.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

      The article is very short.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        My article is 12 inches and very girthy actually, thank you! There used to be a surgeon in California to help you all with short articles. Sadly, you know, the fires…

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Short article, yet you failed to include the third that makes it illegal to jerk it:

        “As written by Sen. Bradford Blackmon, the bill would make it “unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo.””

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Controlling how adult people practice sex now, eh. Boy, I sure hope all these Trump voters are very happy now.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        O… kay. Was I correct? I tried interpreting the rules listed in the link and drew a conclusion about what they’re trying to achieve. 🤷‍♂️ Thanks for trying to help, good buddy.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            I tried interpreting the rules listed in the link and drew a conclusion

            This is what I said. Did you read that part? I did read it, I’m just not certain what the real agenda is behind this ridiculous nonsense.

            You’ve made two replies now wasting your energy by being rude instead of helping. Is this how you treat people you meet in person as well? Sheesh, bro.

            Also your question makes no sense. I’m “not interested” yet I’m still asking? Who would ask if they’re not interested? That makes no sense. Just like someone replying with rude shit instead of helping. That also makes zero sense.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      You should read the actual article then as you will be surprised to discover what this guy’s actual goals are.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I did read the article. While I understand he’s trying to even out the responsibility for pregnancy, I’m at a loss to understand how this will legitimately help in any way.