• HKPiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I love Firefox, but I can’t shake the feeling that it is slower on YouTube. My tinfoil hat theory is that Google somehow throttles YouTube on Firefox.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    FF is doing great. All the have to do now is the Steam strategy. Do nothing and wait for the competition to fuck themselves over.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thats the problem tho, the new mozilla leadership is on the “do anything but nothing” ship. I really hope they either dont do anything too horrible or someone forks it if they do.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Steam’s strategy was to be first to market and essentially the only player in the game for a decade, making themselves the default.

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You mean hope that they too don’t become subject to enshittification? I don’t have a lot of faith in that.

      Besides that, Google is controlling as fuck. They might keep fucking themselves over but there’s no way they won’t start attempting to ruin things for the rest of us.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It seems Mozilla is not immune to the AI hype. I just hope their AI endeavour won’t kill them when the AI hype finally ends.

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thankfully the AI use is very tame so far, used for stuff like offline alt text generation and offline translation. I’m personally still concerned about copyrights and ethics of the models used, but at least it’s directed towards providing specific features, not a magic cure-all.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m more concerned with Mozilla spending its meager resources to chase some fads instead of focusing on improving firefox.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    chrome used to be good. Emphasis on the past tense.

    Firefox was always good. Chrome was very briefly better. Firefox has not suffered enshittification like chrome did.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, I clearly remember firefox being terrible back when Chrome was just beginning to take off.

      It was a lumbering monolith that ate all your ram and loaded pages at a glacial pace. Chrome was a multi-process revolution from that.

      Then, firefox got it’s shit together and chrome got overloaded with corpo bullshit.

    • Dr. Zoidberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This. Firefox has always been just good. It wasn’t great or anything, it was just a good browser. Then chrome came around and it had more, better features. It was a bit more memory usage, but those were for the additional features Firefox didn’t have.

      Firefox didn’t really change a whole lot, it added synching features across accounts, and didn’t get worse. It just stayed the same.

      The people made Firefox better, because now they’re creating add-ons for Firefox, where chrome had more.

      I feel like once chrome got the majority of browser users, it immediately started going to shit. I have no proof of this, just a memory of it being better until it was announced that chrome was the most used browser, and the near immediate heavier memory usage.

      • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t know what rock you’ve been living under where you think base Firefox wasn’t ever improved

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    People saying FF is slower: like how much slower? are we taking like 14 millisecond slower? Cause everything seems pretty instantaneous here. Maybe its because i’m old enough to remember DSL and 56k internet, but I think FF os crazy fast and even if Chrome would be 25% faster I wouldn’t switch to evil google for that.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have been on the firefox train since it was new. I witnessed the rise of Chrome and Chromium, and never really felt the pull, and worried about everyone targeting the same platform. Figured I’d stay on FF until I had no choice. Don’t see myself leaving.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Figured I’d stay on FF until I had no choice. Don’t see myself leaving.

      i’m in a similar boat and given the overwhelming majority popular use of chrome, it feels clear to me that firefox will eventually stop working and i wonder what surfing will like like for me in the future.

      i suspect i’ll have to go back to use chrome again.

  • Chaos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Same as the flavors of Ubuntu are superior to Ubuntu it’s self, the forks of Firefox are better than Firefox it self.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I remember when Chrome was released, all marketing was on how much faster it rendered webpages, I never saw that as an issue, Firefox was fast enough, I tried Chrome for a bit, and hated the UI, I remember being confused as to why everyone loved Chrome suddenly, and frankly, I still am a bit confused by both the sudden shift, and the absolute market dominance by Chrome…

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Chrome is very good at running Google’s pages. Even before Google owned YouTube chrome was better at YouTube.

    • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember being confused as to why everyone loved Chrome suddenly

      Because they were still using Explorer before that

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fair, I can see that, I guess my question was more for the people who already had switched to Firefox

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Firefox is slower, not because it’s worse, but Gecko is a minority engine in the web (~3-4%) and because of this the most webs are optimized for Blink. That is the only reason and because most current Browsers are using it, a devils circle. The result of leaving Google hands-free for too long and that for 20 years the number of available engines has remained stagnant (3 and some testimonial exotic forks) because it is the most complicated part of a browser. Little can be done now.

    Well, Apples WebKit is even worse than Gecko, as a small consolation for FF users.

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ve switched to Firefox but there’s definitely a few things that irritate me about it.

    First thing is when I boot up my computer, launch Firefox, it launches long enough for me to click a bookmark then closes to perform an update. And then doesn’t automatically reopen…

    I also have it set to not “remember” my tabs after closing. Yet when I launch Firefox for the first time after rebooting or closing ally tabs, it gives me a “hmm… we’re having a hard time finding your previous session” message. Uh, yeah, I told you not to look for it… can I just have the regular “new tab” page?

    It also might just be because I’m used to chrome, but I feel the mobile app is severely lacking. I hate that I can’t access my bookmarks directly from the new tab page, and that the tablet version doesn’t show you your bookmark bar. The synchronization between mobile and desktop isn’t great either, I’ll have a very long specific search query that I’ve used multiple times on my phone, yet it doesn’t offer it for auto-complete on desktop, I have to search the entire term again or go digging through my history. When you’re searching long model numbers and the like, this is incredibly frustrating.

    Finally, and I don’t know if this is a Firefox issue, but there’s some memory leak that occurs when viewing a webcam stream from my raspberry pi that only has happened in Firefox. The first time I noticed it happening my PC slowed to a crawl, when task manager finally opened Firefox was taking 23GB of RAM. So I have to use chrome to keep that steam open for more than a few minutes at a time.

    • ftbd@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m curious as to why Firefox is checking for updates, have you configured it to do so? I’ve never seen Firefox do that (and it feels weird to have a program sidestep the update mechanism of the package manager)

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I never really cared that a browser could load a page in 1.5 seconds instead of 1.9… I mean who cares?

  • MewtwoLikesMemes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly, I’m less worried about the speed and moreso I just don’t like supporting Google’s de facto monopoly of the Web’s infrastructure.

    • Archon of the Valley@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing is, using a Chromium-based browser isn’t contributing to their monopoly unless Google holds sway over the fork. Brave, Vivaldi, those two are generally fine and stand against what Google has been up to.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Functionality wise, chrome is better than Firefox but it’s bad when it comes to privacy and ads

  • Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d like to try out ff but I’d have to use it for a few days. Is it possible to possible to sync passwords and bookmarks with my Google account like chrome? How’s the touchscreen support?

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Firefox mobile isn’t there yet. Passwords will conveniently autofill from your Google account thanks to the Android level implementation of password management, but more importantly it’s resource heavy and bad UI design. Ublock support is nice but some websites just don’t deal with it well. The nightly builds do fix my main problems with the UI but they crash all the time. So there’s hope for the future, but for now it’s not great unless you absolutely need proper browser level ad blocking rather than Blokada.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tbh I switched to Firefox mobile from Chrome and have the opposite experience. While it is in someway less convenient for auto fill, as long as my Google account is logged in on another browser page I can always use it for that and they have password and credit card auto fill features should you want to take care of them.

    • hungrybread [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are they? I watch YouTube on Firefox all the time, seems fine on my machine.

      I think maybe 5+ years ago there were some performance issues caused by YT relying on features that were only implemented in Chrome, but I don’t recall having any issues wrt that for years.