• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe. There’s an argument for accelerationism. I’m not convinced of it yet, but clearly the system has entrenched interests that benefit from things being awful for everyone else, and the majority power in the Democratic party has showed that it’s all too willing to roll up its sleeves and make minor adjustments. Most folks don’t have 3000 years to wait for the democrats to finally adjust things to where they need to be, and in the case of climate change, we certainly don’t have that time. Yes, pushing the system to collapse is going to be fucking awful, but I actually wonder if the net suffering will be less than waiting however long it takes for the lesser evil to turn good.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I guess. I worked in EMS for fifteen years and saw my fair share of the system exploiting, abusing, and killing (yeah, I’ll stand by that one) people for profit. We’ve also had major medical events in the family, and had to deal with the insurance fucking with us to try and get out of paying. It only ever seems to move in one direction, which is towards fucking people harder. A system like that deserves a swift kick in the pants, not a gentle polishing.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It sounds like it relies on the hopium that at some point people will wake up. You are certainly more optimistic than I would be.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Biden did more to battle climate change than any president in living memory. Trump has done the opposite, we don’t have another four years of runway to speed the collapse, the time for revolution was when Bush stole the election.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Biden did more to battle climate change than any president in living memory.

        You know what causes ungodly amounts of pollution? war. Blowing up and burning whole cities. Biden sent the bombs that blew up all of the west bank and Gaza, and ensured the war would continue. Dont lecture us about how great an environmental president he was. Biden also set up drilling and mineral exploitation everywhere. He was no environmentalist.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Dude, we’re just not going to meet the climate goals we need to. Not with Biden, not with Trump. We need someone that’s not afraid of the owner class bitching and moaning and withholding donations, and our system simply isn’t wired that way.

        But I’ll bite, what did Biden do to address climate change, and what’s the tangible impact?

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The Inflation Reduction Act encouraged $3 trillion of investments in renewable energy, he’s been working to triple nuclear energy production, and he blocked the construction of oil pipelines.

          It’s not about picking a candidate to meet the goals, that ship has sailed. We had the choice between Biden/Harris and Trump, the difference in climate policy between them is staggering.

      • holo@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        …No, he didn’t. Just by any measure no he didn’t. Even if you just limit it to US presidents, no he didn’t. Nixon did more for climate change than Biden, by several orders of magnitude.

          • holo@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Nixon created the EPA, expanded the national park system as well as explicitly protected the Everglades from development, and worked to transition from coal to nuclear power. He was the last of the conservativism = conservation conservatives.

            There are accounts he primarily did all of this to just ensure his reelection and accumulate political capital and good will, but that hardly changes the fact he was one of the best US presidents in terms of environmental policy.