The star of David was adopted as a Zionist symbol, not a Jewish symbol. Before ~1850 it would be ridiculous to conflate the two, and until the 1940s it was still incredibly controversial to link it to Judaism. It was ironically the Nazis that popularized the idea a hexagram should be the Jewish symbol.

Id love to leave it back there, except everyone on .world is celebrating the Tiktok ban because ‘those sneaky Chinese were stealing their data’. Half of .world believes China is a dictatorship with xi being a king. This level of propaganda didn’t end in the 1950s.

Note:don’t do this if you’re a minority compared to your cities population

You’d think so, but . world’s TOS is a poison that tends to enshittify all its comms eventually. It’s also absolutely not preaching to the choir on e.g. world or news .world.

This is a .world comm, anything that doesn’t repeat CIA introduced facts is usually banned for misinformation, and anything that threatens or challenges the world is that US capitalism is the best thing for humanity is banned and suppressed.

Liberalism requires genocide to function.

That’s liberalism. Liberalism is freedom contingent on capital, and serves capitalism first.

Nixon created the EPA, expanded the national park system as well as explicitly protected the Everglades from development, and worked to transition from coal to nuclear power. He was the last of the conservativism = conservation conservatives.

There are accounts he primarily did all of this to just ensure his reelection and accumulate political capital and good will, but that hardly changes the fact he was one of the best US presidents in terms of environmental policy.

No, Patrick, not everyone that disagrees with you is a bad faith actor.

That’s part of the problem with modern liberals, you’ve propagandized yourselves into believing you’re the only intelligent creatures and anything or anyone else that doesn’t agree must be subhuman idiots. It’s why you people constantly fail to secure even the easiest of support.

Right, when you choose to be black, people like you give it consequences. Your logic is flawless.

I’m not the person you were arguing with. Based on your argument, your words, there are no consequences for discriminating against black people, and shouldn’t be.

There are, if you include the law, but since we’re ignoring it to make your argument work, there’s no consequences.

When arguing something, trying arguing the opposite to yourself before posting.

…No, he didn’t. Just by any measure no he didn’t. Even if you just limit it to US presidents, no he didn’t. Nixon did more for climate change than Biden, by several orders of magnitude.

Based on your argument, free speech means no consequences. Stop being a debate bro if you’re this bad at it.

You were wrong, and he thoroughly showed you how you were wrong.

By your logic being black has consequences.

Forklift operators yes, construction workers also yes depending on the region. In many areas of the US the majority of construction workers are undocumented workers and thus kept at or below minimum wage. Forklift operators really don’t make a lot of money. Like more than general warehouse labor but even in decent states that tends to be pretty low on the spectrum.

The uighur ‘genocide’ has anecdotes from former al qaeda members supporting it, and pictures from drug rehabs… That’s it. Compared to every single other genocide on the planet, it has the least amount of evidence.

Anyway, rule 3.