To follow this up. Do you need a physicist’s opinion?

-Making a watch: No
-Making a watch for space: Yes

-Making fireworks: No
-Making a nuclear bomb: Yes

Yeah well, they can pipe up when their reality shattering edge cases actually start occurring. Until then, good enough is good enough.

Oh yeah, I meant to express I was painting a comparison with animals and nature, not pedophelia.

Also, my address won’t show on that site :)

Survival dance sounds interesting ;) But yes, humans are herd animals really. We figured out we’re stronger together and set some common rules, and we don’t want to be left outside so we conform.

Irony is, we’re also predators - and crucially our own is not excluded from predation. (in the nature sense not the sex offender sense)

-Jeff Goldblum

Pretty sure every human who understands the concept of death are stressed about it at some point in their life.

So, those who do not understand the concept would probably not stress over it. Like someone with brain damage, or animals I guess.

Who knows, maybe my cat is in a bad mood sometimes because she is having an existential crisis, but I kinda doubt it.

So, you’re saying that’s all it takes for you to consider a convicted conman for president instead? Sound reasonable.

You may not be happy with your options, but the choice is abundantly clear.

Exactly. It is very rare that I find someone willing to claim responsibility for an issue nowadays, but when I do I feel it reflects very positively on them.

It’s just finger pointing to avoid liability.

“Oh no, that’s not our fault! It’s these guys who did it, so talk to them!”