Soulless ✅
Spreads misinformation ✅
Blood sucking parasite ✅
Needs to be invited into your life ✅
Run by a larger blood sucking parasite ✅
Turns people into other blood sucking parasites ✅

Vampires are just social media for the 1700s

Guise, it only ate part of his brain. Ok? Not the whole thing. Like literally just a little nibble here and there. /S

Please try to post memes that fit with the vibe of the instance. We have a pretty loose definition here, since I’m not a heavy handed mod, but this one doesn’t fit.

This comment was reported, but I’ll leave it in tact because it lends itself to the conversation and you weren’t a dick with response afterwards

Rock, and 5000 live cockroaches

Lol. I just stick it back into the outgoing mail slot if they dont listen to me. My box is clearly marked with 'no junk mail’s signage.

Holy shit.

men aren’t inherently bad… Etc.

Looks like you understand the intent of the original tweet.

Not all men - but some men - and we (other men) need to start calling our the Tater-tots and the like

I don’t think that the original tweet is really getting at stereotypes, but rather pointing out how frustrating it must be to not know who’s going to be a scumbag and who is not.

It’s not all men, most certainly, yet chauvinism counties to be (an increasing problem). One of the (very make dominated) places I worked had to put up signs that read looking versus leering: know the difference. I’m male, and I most certainly get the frustration after hearing more than a few first hand accounts about how women are routinely mistreated.

That would be Wytch Hazel

I’m a master baiter

Rats.

Dunno about you, but I’m bopping the bishop right now bb.

Bruh was a deer in his past life

Yeuff. That’s a rabbithole and a half, I imagine. I don’t know much about it, but IIRC leading theories are related to the plague or a bunch of migration i think

We would still have lobbyists telling politicians that trains are a terrible idea

I disagree with you, and @relianceschool@slrpnk.net - respectfully.

I’m not trying to detract from AI’s issues, or insist that we can only address one issue at a time. However, if I was given $100 Million to address these issues, I’d be investing 99 millon into dealing with water, land, and mining related issues, as those can have immediate effects. Emissions are such a hard one to address, since it requires buy in from literally everyone (look how hard that was with COVID, and people were dying right there and then due to it). Regulating and reducing AI emissions seems a lower priorty to me compared to things like better O&G regulation which are likely to have larger impacts on overall emssions.

Because this is what we need to be focusing on, not environmental responsibility from large polluters.

We are continually approving oil, gas, and coal projects, yet let’s focus on the contradiction of environmentalists existing in a system where their very existence causes them to emit, regardless of how careful their choices.

Don’t worry about this, it’s fine

It’s just sitting there menacingly next to the Athabasca river.