No US laws. There are other countries outside the US though. There are indeed laws in my jurisdiction that mandate insurance and If you can’t afford to live in the city, there are no jobs without a car.

I don’t doubt the US is that way, but the US has a very unique system when it comes to healthcare and insurance generally.

Also the first result in Google suggests there are indeed jurisdictions in the US that penalize a lack of insurance. You should have clicked your own link lol.

What? Business insurance, healthcare, third party property, indemnity.

Try driving a car without insurance and you’ll be arrested in many jurisdictions.

For debugging sake, put the full path to the binary, eg /usr/bin/gotop (check with which gotop)

I don’t think other commenters bothered to watch the trial.

He was acting foolish but he certainly didn’t commit pre-meditated murder.

Which I can totally understand, but I would like to spend more time with my family and less time writing code.

This also allows me to iterate faster and identify useful ideas That justify deeper effort.

Yeah, that’s always a risk, but as you said, humans make mistakes too. And if you change your approach to software development by writing more tests and using strict interfaces or type annotations, etc., it is pretty reliable and definitely saves time.

They can also be really good for quickly writing code if you line up a whole bunch of tests and line up all the types and then copy and paste that a few times, maybe with a macro in Vim.

The LLM will fill in the middle correctly, like 90% of the time. Compare it in git, make sure the tests pass, and then that’s an extra 20 minutes I get to spend with my wife and kids.

It would be on the order of aN intensive video game, maybe. Depends on the size of the model, etc.

Training is definitely expensive but you are right in that it’s a one-time cost.

Overall, the challenge is that it’s very inefficient. To use a machine learning algorithm to do something that could be implemented deductively is not ideal (On the other hand, if it saves human effort…)

To a degree, trained models can also be retrained on newer data (eg freezing layers, LoRa, GaLore, Hypernetworks etc). Also newer data can be injected into a prompt to make sure that the responses are aligned with newer versions of software, for example.

The electricity consumption is a concern, but it’s probably not going to be the end of the world.

Yeah but wine helps lol

I always bring my backpack personally.

What’s your desktop environment? I’m pretty sure hyperland and sway will give a json output of open Windows.

You could parse that with jq and pipe it into fzf or dmenu?

Not quite the same as the clicking but probably just as quick.

Consistent with the notion that man was made in the image of God based on my experience with humanity.

Yeah I love this Train of thought because it’s an interesting thing to consider.

I often remote into my machine, so it’s a lot easier to type the command.

In most common law jurisdictions, the executive branch doesn’t require even a victim, they merely need the elements of the criminal offence satisfied.

Not sure about the US, likely they need her to strengthen the case and won’t bother without her witness testimony.

But think of the shareholders, they could have been the real victims /s

Whilst this is absolutely true, I think it’s more constructive to focus on the failure in design that led to the confusion in the cockpit.

There is no doubt that children in the cockpit contributed to the incident, but that incident could have happened with some other distraction.

The failure for the aircraft to correctly notify the pilot of the change in autopilot configuration was clearly very dangerous.

Yeah it’s great! Check it out.

IPSC is common around the world.

In my research group we could tell instantly and it would usually act as a mark against the paper (ie read this one later).

If you’re reading a lot of papers it becomes apparent.