• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Free” elections in Cuba would just mean immediate US vassalage. Influencing elections in the Caribbean and Latin America is a practically a US hobby.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Right? It’s easy to bloviate about “free, democratic fair elections” when you’re the world’s superpower. When you live NEXT to the world’s superpower, there’s no such thing.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Fantastically well said. Cuba’s a very democratic country, moreso than the US, so when people accuse it of not being so that can only mean they wish to remove the safeguards preventing US recolonization.

          • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            33 minutes ago

            Canada and Mexico both live next to the USA and both have freer and more fair elections than the USA so Im not sure your claim even makes sense on the surface.

            According to another poster Cuba has non-Marxist candidates who can run. IF Cubans have the ability to completely cast aside the government, regardless of ideology, then they have free elections. If they cannot then they don’t have free elections.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 minutes ago

              Have you been paying attention at all?

              Trump is literally actively “joking” about annexing Canada this week, and they’ve been exporting MAGA brain rot to Canada for years.

              Trump also threatened to unilaterally invade/bomb Mexico to attack cartels.

              How is that not directly interfering with “free and fair elections”

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If giving the Cubans the choice to no longer pursue Marxism resulted in them choosing to no longer follow Marxism why should that be stopped? If that was what the population wanted why should the state force them to adhere to an unwanted ideology?