• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Almost all pollution is by industries and not your parents, so…

    If anything you could criticize them if they voted to keep the pollution going.

    • Miaou@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Buying a big SUV, shopping at h&m, eating red meat multiple times a week, and flying to the other side of the world during summer, are all worse than voting for climate change. Companies don’t pollute for the sake of it.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Check out the EPA’s stats on ghg emissions at this LINK. 28% of emissions total are from non-agriculture/shipping transportation, and if you break that down then 57% of the 28% are light duty vehicles, all larger road vehicles are 23%, and aircraft are 9%.

        Since 2005 emissions carbon-equivalent total of the USA has fallen about a billion metric tons thanks to awareness and federal programs to reduce and eliminate emissions, almost exclusively in the Electrical Power sector.

        So even if you cut out all consumer non-business transport you’re left with 72% of emissions. A person who votes to curttail polution does more good than a person who drives a hybrid.

        • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Hybrids don’t reduce CO2 emissions that much anyway. Better to go all electric and vote for climate protection.