• ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Kamala wants a ceasefire and Trump does not. These positions are not the same. With Kamala we have a chance to make things better. With Trump they will only get worse. The fact Israel is sabotaging efforts to achieve a ceasefire is not indicative that Kamala does not mean what she says. Wanting things to get better and wanting them to get worse are not the same.

    Kamala chose Tim Walz over Josh Shapiro, a Zionist. Kamala met with leaders of the Uncommitted Movement. So Kamala has shown she is going to be different than Biden.

    Kamala is getting rid of Blinken. They phrased it as Blinken wouldn’t stay even if she asked, but she’s not asking. It’s safe to assume that there will be a change in US foreign policy for the better where the US will be less lenient to Israel. Again, considering how the US position on Israel has not changed in 70 years this is a substantial improvement. Democrats got rid of Biden and put Kamala in his place on the ticket. It is possible to move the needle further, but we need our democracy in order to do that. Under a christo-fascist dictatorship US foreign policy can only get worse.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/09/05/blinken-kamala-harris/

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      She says she wants a ceasefire but none of her actions have indicated as such in interviews or the DNC. You can’t just ask for one from Netanyahu, you have to use leverage. If she refuses to do so before negotiations even start, then it doesn’t matter what she says, she won’t get that ceasefire. Biden also has said he wants one, for example. Don’t be Charlie Brown with the football.

      However, I will have to admit I didn’t know Blinken isn’t staying on, which does make me breathe a sigh of relief. I’m also glad for Walz, or was in the beginning, but he hasn’t been much better lately. Historically, he’s been better than Shapiro, who volunteered to run Hasbara for the IDF, but lately his rhetoric has been the same. Hopefully she impresses, but I wouldn’t bet on it.

      And the US has smacked Israel down before. It’s weird that Biden is to the right of Kissinger and Reagan on Israel.

      They only replaced Biden because they were afraid of losing the election. The election is where all the leverage is. After that, there’s nothing, no power that can be exercised that those in charge care about (except for money, but the ones with that are right leaning and Zionists).

      Thanks for the article on Blinken, though. That’s some much needed good news in these sad times. It’d be better if he was tried at the Hague but at least he won’t in power still if she wins.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        An election is an exercise in basic civic duty that should be a mechanical choice. It is not leverage. Leverage is building grassroots movements between elections. If we lose our democracy there will be no Democratic Party to leverage against. Republicans want a christo-fascist dictatorship and want to jail their political opponents.

        If we keep our democracy it will be possible to vote for candidates to the left of Kamala. Without it we will have fascists running the country who will not give up power freely.

        Here’s a website for searching what Republicans want to do on your favorite issues:

        https://www.25and.me/?topics=