• x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    They can have a perfectly fine vegan diet.

    I think all of you need to: GET OVER IT.

    It’s just that simple.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean you’re the one coming into a thread in a different community getting snarky with multiple different people who are all being pretty level headed so

    • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Let’s just say you’re right, it’s perfectly possible and healthy for the cat.

      Does that make it ethical to force a carnivorous hunter animal on a vegan diet? Are you going to force it to stay inside to limit the possibility for it to catch mice & birds just to be sure?

      Just beyond the physical possibility, how ethical is it to force our choices onto our pets?

      • Floey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Most people I’ve talked to, which is mostly nonvegans, think it is unethical to let cats outside because they will kill wild animals. This is a more hypocritical stance than the reverse (a vegan who lets their cat outside) if you understand veganism.

        You’re also throwing around the word forced. People force choices on their pets, children, and even fellow adults all the time, but there are different levels of force. Putting down food for a cat that gladly eats it is a far cry away from shoving something down their throat or leaving it out until they have no choice but to eat it. I’d argue that it’s often very appropriate to make food choices for a cat you live with, if a cat begs for some lasagna or a donut you probably shouldn’t give it to them.

        Edit: Also when people talk about forcing cats onto a vegan diet you have to realize the alternative is forcing livestock to suffer serious trauma for their entire life and then die. It’s not hard to see that one of these is a more serious abuse of our power over other animals.

      • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it is a lot more ethical than forcing death because people enjoy eating their meat.

        Also, “forced” is the wrong word. Only very few vegans would be stupid enough to not monitor their pet in these cases. And you can talk shit about them as much as you want because they are wrong. But somebody that’s just trying to see if it’s possible while monitoring and following up on the health of their animals? Sure.

        • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What do you mean by forcing being the wrong word? Do you give the cat a bowl of meat and a bowl of vegan alternative for a month, and then see what the cat chooses? That would not be forcing imo. But i doubt that’s happening anywhere.

          • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No you give them reinforced vegan pet food and see if they like it and remain healthy. If they don’t then you just switch back.

            Vegan pet food is specifically designed to have all the nutrients they need.