• Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And this is why nuclear powers don’t start stupid wars of conquest, because if they fail (normally they fail), “nukes fly”.

          • Gsus4@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Sharp as a rusty cleaver. I really don’t understand what you are trying to say. What about Vietnam? Who tried to conquer it, China? You understand what an annexation is? The only time an annexation worked since WW2 was sort of Tibet at least that I can remember.

              • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                And what was your cleaver point? I’m going to take a chair and sit down to listen to your wisdom. Please 🫱

    • Linktank@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty soon the world is going to need proof that they have even one working warhead before that stops being a viable defense.

      • spechter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I remind you of the famous launch-site homing russian SAM and dare them to prove it.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s just the thing: No one knows, not even the Russians.
        Which is why they won’t launch them. Cause that could lead to a worse outcome for Putin than total annihilation - public embarassment.