• FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was so excited when I got a big raise (10%), thinking it would change things. Then inflation happened and I’m back to watching my finances.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t think that $75k was to live comfortably, I think the $75k was to feel happy about your income.

      Ninja edit: found it:

      …Daniel Kahneman, who in 2010 published an influential study with fellow Nobel Prize-winner Angus Deaton. The 2010 study found that money could only boost happiness up to a point — about $75,000 in annual earnings. Beyond that figure, the researchers concluded, money had little impact.

      but…

      Now, new research from a Nobel Prize-winning economist and fellow researchers provides a fresh answer. Money does appear to boost happiness — at least for most people — up to earnings of $500,000, according to the new paper published in this month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/money-happiness-study-daniel-kahneman-500000-versus-75000/

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    My annual income is barely 13k Canadian. While a level of income that produces crushing poverty here, it is in fact roughly the global median income.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    $186k? Yeah, uh, where exactly in the US? I’d venture a guess in most places anything over $100k is pretty comfortable, if you’re financially responsible.

    EDIT: I’ve come to the conclusion that a good chunk of Lemmy users either live in Seattle, or have no actual concept of money.

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s the whole point; location. The amount necessary to be comfortable is very dependent on your location.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Property prices correlate strongly with local income levels. Owners know how much you make and they fix prices of wages, rent and other cost.

            Hence why u can make objectively high income and feel like a peasant.

            Buying power is eroded to the point where 100k is just getting by wage in Seattle or some shit

          • Mojave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah and I’m not getting this fat ass cloud SE job while living in fucking Yoder, Wyoming

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Here’s my experience. I make $180,000/yr. Family of five. Wife stays home and has a consulting gig she does when she wants to. We live in Northwest Arkansas. Far from the most expensive place in the country but experiencing massive growth and becoming increasingly expensive. Our only debt is our mortgage and a loan on our minivan. We own our other vehicle outright.

      We live reasonably comfortably. Definitely not extravagant. We’re also tightwads and I stay in top of our finances. We paid $345k for a fixer-upper home. Average home price in our area for similar homes is probably closer to $450k. It’s liveable but ultimately needs a full remodel. I figure it will take about 5 years doing most of it myself. If I had to pay contractors to do all of it, it would not be feasible. Most of them are so busy they don’t even give you the time of day anyways.

      Material costs are insane. I mean absolutely bonkers. I would guess I’m spending double what I did for the same materials I used for my last remodel project on our previous house, four years ago. The five year plan is partly because we can’t afford to go any faster.

      If I made $100k/yr, we would never have bought a house. Wouldn’t have even been able to save enough for the down payment. I also seriously doubt we would have had our last two kids.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m not complaining. I’m pretty fortunate. I have things I worry about but money isn’t one of them. I know where my next paycheck is coming from and if it doesn’t come, we have enough money in the bank to get by for a while.

      The same cannot be said for the vast majority of Americans, even ones making $100k/yr, which is not nearly as good a salary as it used to be.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve come to the conclusion that a good chunk of Lemmy users either live in Seattle, or have no actual concept of money.

      More likely that most of the people making 6 figures are living in moderate to high cost of living areas plus the inherent draw of tech-minded people on a platform such as this.

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree, but a significant portion (maybe even most) of our country’s population do live in very high cost of living areas such as the west cost, DC, Boston, and Miami.

      The situation is vastly different in most of the country’s less remarkable cities, like San Antonio, Minneapolis, Oklahoma City, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, or Nashville, and I think articles like this only ever account for one side of the equation or the other.

      To someone living in DFW (my home), “needing” almost $200k is insane. Honestly I doubt I’d know what to do with that money unless I just bought a bunch if shit I don’t want.

    • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Where I live, that would be a ludicrous income, definitely comfortable money.

      In California, that would be a lower-middle-class-maybe-i-own-my-home-if-i-bought-early mind of an income. Our regions are so different in cost of living that these kinds of numbers can get funny/confusing

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s no such thing as the middle class. That’s just what capitalists’ pets call themselves to feel like they somehow deserve not being afraid of starving in the street like most people in the working class.