

the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content,
If only we had some way to reference an original source. Something like a figurative link, if you will.
the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content,
If only we had some way to reference an original source. Something like a figurative link, if you will.
If only there was a way to copy text, and then paste it someplace else. Sigh… unsolved problems.
Last I checked, archive.org usually didn’t work when articles are paywalled. Has that changed?
In my experience, it depends on when the snapshot is made. If made early enough that the paywall was not yet in place (probably because publishers want their articles to be indexed by search engines) then it will not have the paywall.
One nice thing about archive.org’s mirroring is that they list all their snapshots of a page by date and time, so if the latest one contains a paywall, you can sometimes go back to the first one and find it with no paywall.
A useful product can be nice, but I wouldn’t call this patent uplifting news.
It would be interesting to see the annual global power consumption from design choices like this.
That image has plenty of resolution to be legible. Try zooming in.
deleted by creator
I think that’s reasonable when when calculating an average.
It also assumes that men were the only other participants. ;)
Wow. I hope she recovers fully and quickly.
583 men in six hours.
That’s about 37 seconds each.
Thank you for the source link conveniently placed at the top. <3
This is absolutely not uplifting news, and does not belong here.
Trump encouraged and signed this bill so he can use it to silence criticism. He said so himself.
It’s also yet another example of bad legislation, in this case a censorship tool, disguised as something intended for good.
If you upload an image, the URL field is populated with the URL of the uploaded image, so there’s not really multiple fields like it appears.
Sure enough; I just discovered this for myself when running some tests. I also noticed that Lemmy offers an Alt Text field, which it looks like the bot is already populating.
Test 1 : The URL field and the image attachment field were used; the latter overwrites whatever is placed in the former. I guess this might be modeled after Reddit.
Test 2: A direct link to the image at xkcd.com was placed in the URL field, and the source link placed at the top of the body. Result: This is similar to the bot’s current format, including the flaw that a desktop browser with strict privacy settings won’t show the comic image as part of the post when the thumbnail is clicked, because it’s an off-site image. Having the source link at the top of the body does at least make it a little more convenient to click through to xkcd.com’s single-page view.
Test 3: Only the image attachment field was used; the URL field was left blank. Result: This allows a desktop browser to show the comic image in-line when the thumbnail is clicked even with strict browser privacy settings, if the post is being viewed on the Lemmy instance where the post was made, because then it’s not an off-site image. Unfortunately, it’s still an off-site image when viewed on other Lemmy instances. The source link was again placed at the top of the body.
(Side note: I used m.xkcd.com links instead of plain xkcd.com links in these tests, just to see how the mobile site looks in different browsers. In practice, either ought to work.)
Conclusion: I don’t have one just yet. It would be nice if we could direct all Lemmy instances to make their own local copy of a post’s attached image, to avoid the off-site image problem. Unfortunately, I don’t think there is a way to do this, and I suspect it would be too burdensome for some small instances.
Having the source link at the top of the post body is helpful, at least.
I’m not sure the current comment votes are representative, due to the selection bias that forms as people engage (or don’t) with idea comments & their replies, but I acknowledge that it is possible that a proper vote would end up as you expect.
EDIT: Lemmy posts have both an URL field and an image field. What would happen if the change I suggested was made, and the image field was used for the coming image? Hm… Maybe that’s worth a test.
If directly linking to the full comic page as the main link is a no-go, how about putting the source link at very top, as the first line in the body? That would at least make it a little easier for desktop users to target the link they need for a single-screen view of the whole comic.
I guess this is going to come down to desktop vs mobile preference.
In that case, perhaps linking to the mobile site would make sense, since it ought to work for both mobile and desktop:
Still not equivalent, since it still requires multiple steps, and doesn’t work with privacy settings that forbid off-site images.
That splits the comic between two separate screens, and requires multiple steps (and page loads) to read it.
It’s not as good as linking to the whole comic, intact, in one place.
The mobile browsers I’ve used let you long-press the image to see the hover text.
If yours doesn’t, you can always prepend m.
to the domain name, like this: https://m.xkcd.com/3090/
Truer words were never said. :)