this is an amazing study in how to go carefully, point-by-point, through something, and refute none of it.
this is an amazing study in how to go carefully, point-by-point, through something, and refute none of it.
Existing relationship (boss) might not be leading with compersion 🙃
*cheese-flavored food product
fucking your neighbor’s pet cat is morally neutral
yeah this is turning out to be as wild as I expected
also already covered by rule #3
so you think all humans have rights to do any kinds of violent, invasive acts to any animal, as long as they call it a “veterinary procedure”? is there anything a human could do to an animal which you would classify as “rape”?
and getting a giant steel horn implanted in your forehead would be a cosmetic procedure, but i guess you’d be pretty upset if someone did it to you without asking?
artificial insemination would fit the legal definition of rape in several jurisdictions in the world if you did it to a human.
how do you think dairy cows are always pregnant if they’re not being forcibly impregnated 🤔🤔
if you eat or drink any dairy products then you have almost certainly paid a company to rape some animals for you.
I think you might be 180° missing the point of the meme
you might be interested in this https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/pardon-the-expression/pique-my-interest-vs-peak-my-interest/
mournfully flipping the counter back to “0” on the “it has been X days since a turbolib said something deeply homophobic” sign
with the armband as well it seems like kind of a dogwhistle
Sure, like any other wildly unethical job there’s a spectrum of different people’s privilege and ability to easily cut out to a less cartoonishly evil job – I would hold Person A with a background in cybersecurity and no dependants a lot more responsible for every day they remain a cop than Person B who joined police academy straight out of high school and is supporting 5 children etc.
But saying that Person B should be excluded from “fuck cops” – that is, that there should be an exception to the general cultural work of making it socially unacceptable to be part of a murderous, racist, unjust, reactionary paid army – is supporting the institution that you’re claiming to be against. Waiting until a complete societal transformation before campaigning for people to not take blood money (your euphemistic “consciousness price”) is valuing Person B’s economic solvency over the lives of the people they (or, being generous, just their colleagues) will harass, target, frame, and even kill.
cool can you point me at the repo for their server software then? and the f-droid reproducible build of their android app, or the sideloadable iOS app?
claims to be secure
closed source
total snakeoil
“the problem is the institution, not the people actively participating in the institution in exchange for money and power” what
I saw it was from Microsoft and bailed before it even loaded… the only thing those clowns know about open source is how to try (and fail) to kill it