I did, but every time I made one, it lacked “soul”. So if I want to do some aabstract stuff, I’d rather use inkscape myself instead.

Tell me what you think afterwards!

It is an option, but for now, I want to prioritise Debian based OS first, as many people uses it.

For now the links is still on the horizon, I think its doable though, even with encryption. Tauri have been a good friend in the development phase, it does what it do fine. Sometimes I need to get my head around a performance spike though, just found out linux tauri (gtkwebkit i think) doesnt play well with shadows css. It slows the damn thing.

The docs are very thorough, for my usecase anyway.

treedome_0.5.4_amd64.deb is the linux build. For now I provide for debian, nix (new version on the way), and arch linux

Youre right damn

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes “the data must be open”. The data used for training must be obtainable.

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

Software engineer here, that’s like some of the modern open source library that’s used by everyone.

How about a license which will also make the collective work into the same license as the work itself? Coverage as in it could reach more in terms of copyleft-ness.

Ah yes, the little old interrupt

Honestly this is the thing I worry the most. Without having encryption as a first class citizen, the ux of the notes will be sacrificed greatly. Simply because good encryption tends to be slow, making the app unproductive imo.

I still don’t get their “privacy coin” based network. I think their luck would look a lot better if they use the existing tor network instead of lokinet.

Was having that kind of idea. If you have any inputs about it, youre welcome to open a pr on treedome

Hmm if it comes to the age of a tech and its stability, I agree. I guess only time will tell. But do you have any suggestion for what this note taking format would look like? I personally think for non encrypted notes, foam’s implementation is on the right track.

the extension could cease to exist, but you can absolutely still access your notes with any text editor decades from now. I still don’t get where the “non-future proof” here. Can’t really be more future proof than a simple text file.

Arguably, open document format, although standardized, are harder to open and manage because it’s far more complex than a text file that ends with .md.

Its future proof tho? Markdown has a standard (or at least a common implementation) and foam is just a tool to automate and graph all the boring parts?

nice, im trying to update it on nixpkgs, will probably make 0.5.1 to fix dependencies stuff in master first tho

If you really want to be future proof and interoperable, I suggest you to use something like a git repository + vscode + foam (https://github.com/foambubble/foam). All of the tech is open source and relatively easy to use, especially if you’re already know git.

Treedome on the other hand can be abandoned. It can be swallowed by the sands of time. It uses a custom file format after all. But because of its open-source nature, as long as you have the code, you can open the notes. But that’s a good idea, to be able to export to a plaintext file. You could make a request here if you want https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/issues

Currently, using syncthing and occasionally pushing it to something like gdrive/mega/Dropbox is what I do