Magnus
- 0 Posts
- 60 Comments
I 'm refering to the fact that these types of incidents are more prevailent as an experience by women under the subjegation of a patriarchical culture that gives males a disproportionate amount pf privilege and status in such a society
Ya I got that. And what I’m saying is that from my own personal experience in this world, I do not see any evidence of this, at all.
Each side plays the cards its got. But each side has the same sleaze, the same depravity, and the same base human drives. They just operate within their own parameters, respectively. Each are equally shit (or good depending on your POV). You are not morally superior because you have an ovary or a testicle (or both or none).
This is also why it’s originally rage bait. Because it’s a completely childish view that most adults never truly snap out of.
In the first Trump election, he made a video calling out any black entertainer that would show up for his inauguration. It was a private vid that got leaked. He was super racist in it.
At Trump’s second inauguration, guess who showed up and played in support? Yup. Snoop.
Search for “snoop video Uncle Tom.” It was in 2016.
It’s never really one thing. Always a myriad of variables that make people what they are.
But I will say, depression is not a disease in and of itself. It is a symptom of a larger problem. Till you can figure out what that problem is in you, you will forever be on SSRIs and tricyclics till the end of your days.
Man did that guy’s arc take a DARK turn. Jesus. What a complete POS Uncle Tom.
Tell him to get his little plane out and come fly to Canada. And to pack a fucking lunch.
Wait. Everything is OK? Is anyone else getting panicked??!
But, like, your president is a Nazi tho…
“I was driving safely! These cars were all over the road! I had to swerve numerous times to avoid them!!”
And? So what? We are talking about things of consequences. Saying the sky is blue and arguing over it that you can’t know that for sure is beyond asinine.
I’d say if you’re arguing over basic objective, a priori truths, you’ve already lost the plot.
I was thinking more of actual, real arguments that lead to real consequences. Claiming I can’t ever prove to you that this case in front of me is green because what even is green is just… dumb.
There is no “typical male experience”. You’re basing that alone on YOUR own experience because what, you consider yourself the prototypical male? Lol. Your experiences belie your own bias if that’s the argument you want to take. You do not represent a committee of men, after all.
Moreover, we don’t need to look at every pigeon if we want to study albinos. We focus on that population.
Here we are focusing on the part of the population that is physically attractive and what they deal with in this supposed “world for men.”
Same thing here. Now you have some “principle” to back you up claiming you can get “ enough”.
Like ok. So when they scan you for that rare space disease that causes people to literally blow up, you’d be fine with them ending the scan at 90% right? Right?
There is no data that isn’t valuable and can sway the ultimate conclusion. None. Only humans have the audacity to think they can cherry pick which lol.
Bro. Take a hard look at yourself.
Oh you guys are still alive? Fucking fossils. The 25 year olds rule this planet!!! Uhhh… uh, carry on.
I get the whole memeness of it all, but in reality, when you boil it down, no one could ever get all the data and present accurate facts. There are too many variables in life.
The guy who wrote that in the end is no better than who he tries to argue with (for the reason above).
As a species we really need to take a step back. Or else the stupid will win and both sides will die thinking they are right.
You may be shocked to learn how many people cannot even remotely, even squinting, tell this distinction apart.
For most people, “right” simply means saying what they say to do.
It’s why everything is burning.
It only takes one zombie to raze a bunker full of people. It only takes one cough to infect someone with a cold. It only takes $1 to mark your payment NSF and incur the penalty.
That’s the point I’m trying to make. That 10% could be HUGE! You can’t quantity life and say “we almost got there, but let’s just say we did.” Would you say I won the race if I only made it 90% of the way?
You need to change your conception “evidence.” Like I asked before, if you had a fatal disease, would you be willing to bet your life on a 90% scan?
Arguments are cool and all, but at the end of the day, you need them to actually have real implications or else… like why?