Objectifying women is considered bad form. It’d be like saying they’re just a sub-class of Person.
Objectifying women is considered bad form. It’d be like saying they’re just a sub-class of Person.
‘Extra-chromo-sapiens’.
The other ones are ‘whiny-chromo-sapiens’.
‘Arsehole’ is a good cross gender term for any humans of known or unknown sex.
the dude abides.
So I turned the job over to a friend of mine . . .
I like the way they think
yes, and the latest “conservative” assailants on UK (maybe mostly English) health system wear red roses on their lapels.
They all see a giant unmilked cash cow wandering around in a short skirt.
Apparently no one is 100% sure whether bloodsucking worms were named after doctors that used them, or doctors were named after the blood sucking worms that they commonly prescribed.
“Leech” being an old timey name for a medical doctor, possibly predating the term “doctor” which just came from “teacher” like “doctrine” or something.
I hate remakes, I normally don’t watch them. Even sequels, especially 3rd or more.
But I believe people - generally - do want to watch remakes, (or formualic films based on cartoons), since that’s all I ever seem to hear about. People seem a lot more likely to talk about “captain bat-spider 5 the egg-sack years” or "starwars the phantom plot connexion " than anything that seems intertesting to me.
I used to live by a cinema that did cheap mondays a few years ago, I think maybe ‘Looper’ and ‘Sightseers’ I remember seeing there most recently. I’ve doubt I’ve seen a new film since then.I think they’re ‘original ish’?
I don’t even know where my nearest cinema is in this town, I think theres a small artsy one in town, but for proper cinemas i think you need a car drive out into the sticks fuck that.
All that aside, I liked lethal weapon 5 more than any other lethal weapon film. Does that count?
Interesting observation. But i still can’t believe it is possible to do things to people that they don’t like. Must’ve been a fluke.
You want to open a .R script that you wrote for R using R-studio . . .
Cool. Let’s force it on everyone else then. Go competition!
If you try to shoot someone in the head they’ll just move too.
Thre must be an equivelent to “ate the onion” for “ate the Arrow-Debreu (1954)”
Which came first:
If the definite article is used then it should be clear from the physical or literal context eggsactly which chicken and which egg are the subjects. This makes the answer a simple matter of asking each for its birth certificate.
If the question has been taken out of context or misquoted - and is now meaningless - well that’s just typical sloppy journalism.
The only people not on the meme are the IT procurement people at my work
share point, one drive, dynamics, office 365, teams.
They’re all ganged up with their swords pointed at me just trying to do some work.
Together they’ve managed unseated oracle as the arch nematode, even thogh none of them actually do anything that i need - apart from maybe filing cabinet.
watch out for dragons. https://youtu.be/Slzv5IJiXaw
you’re going to walk into your cave, and find your power animal
Humans are so naturally stupid that they almost make AI seem intelligent.
Surely he’ll strip NASA, put the bits he wants up for sale, then buy them for cheap.
Sure the best staff might leave, but he’ll probably keep enough of the organisation to get something out of it.
Dozens of lemmings were left stunned and confused today as ‘Flying Squid’ revealed that they are in fact a hammerhead shark with a few tentacles glued on.