• 1 Post
  • 15 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle


  • Got it. So it’s something similar to latest security proposals like not letting me download files on Windows because they are not normally downloaded. Or visiting a website with self signed certificates. So it’s more secure.

    The apps complain: “You need Google Play services to use this app”.

    So it’s about security. Right. What kind of security does McDonaldss need? Does it need security for their coupons?

    Besides that, I thought payment gateway provided very good security by themselves.

    But let’s steer from what happens on mainstream apps a little.

    Isn’t Google Wallet or Online payments insecure too? Don’t they have tons security failures also? Human security failures, like if someone robs my phone and my info they would have access to my money?

    Google and the smartphone industry employ accelerometers and other methods to make sure robbers can’t get to the system. They admit themselves that the systems aren’t safe and they’re working on AI and electronic methods to avoid access to sensitive information.

    Is this the security you’re talking about? Maybe we should just steer the industry another way, like those Custom OSs do. Alternatives aren’t security potential threats. They’re the solution for the problem.

    Making a monopoly based on making it “safe” isn’t secure at all.











  • What do you mean?

    I just find that if pip did not support that version anymore, the software would be lost. As that is covered by making executables, as I mentioned them. But what if I wanted to have access to the libraries that were used in the program? That wouldn’t be possible. Because all we get in the source code is the dependency fetching, not the dependencies themselves.

    It would be good to have an alternative where you get all that you need to compile the code again, not depending on fetching them from websites that might not even have them anymore.

    This mentality of ephemeral code just adheres to the way big tech would like to do things, with programmed obsolescence.

    An alternative to that way of doing things would be nice and would make sure we get access to the same working open source program in 30 or 40 years.




  • I’ve found active small XMPP communities before, so I know they are there, but the client can’t seem to find these niche communities. The communities with most members almost don’t chat about current topics or interesting things. They have a lot of people but no conversation, just like some Discord communities.