Because we don’t have to be all “law of the wild.” Murderers deserve imprisonment, not death and endangerment.
Because we don’t have to be all “law of the wild.” Murderers deserve imprisonment, not death and endangerment.
It takes basically no effort to properly censor things. You left the 9-digit ZIP code in there, which identifies the exact building.
Am I crazy for not wanting anyone to get shot? I know how crazy our politics are getting, and I’m afraid of the future, but we shouldn’t be wanting anyone to be shot at. Life is life, even if it’s attached to the absolute worst person on Earth. Sure, lock up people who are a danger to society, but let’s not celebrate gun violence.
To really twister it up, we should lean on the alliteration and remove the excess words.
Book on book bans banned by board.
Then I ask you: if this is how you rationalize the violence, what prevents you from doing the same?
In a different vein of thought, does this same argument justify those on the far right who are frightened (logically or illogically) of the left threatening violence on their perceived opponents?