19·
3 days agoFools.
Santa has an infinite number of trans-dimensional intra-temporal superluminal decoys.
Y’all just got on the permanent naughty list.
masterofn001
Hi guy
- 0 Posts
- 380 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 12th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
While Santa is superluminal, the military industrial complex is subliminal.
One day, many many years ago, I had a few shots of whiskey with my grandfather and we shot the shit. I’d never had a real conversation with him before. I knew his past, but not from his mouth.
I asked him about WWII and his experience.
He started going off about his time in France.
All the French women he had.
So many women.
My grandmother probably wouldn’t have approved, but he definitely had fun.
Maybe, but they are our last defense against nano bots.
After hearing Assad speak, I have to aassume that’s what he does.
He’s a secret power bottom.
1·18 days agoThat’s the one.
There’s actually 20.
*unzips.
MillionsHundreds of beavers.On a projector at home.
A silent film. From 2022.
Bizarre. Stupid. Funny. Silly. Stupid. Cute. Bizarre. And stupid.
★★★★
It wasn’t jawlani, it was hero Bibi who truly freed the people
andfrom their land.
PMC Lambda reporting for duty
Fair enough, in that blood, milkshakes, and cola are all unhealthy for humans to drink.
Good question.
One source (2023) says
That quantity is estimated to produce about two million grams of cocaine, the publication reported. Today, according to pharmaceutical listings online, that’s worth about US$2 billion
??? That’s … Not right
Bulk value 50 million for 2 million g (2000kg). Going by my (likely now outdated) last known value for a key at around 25k.
They’re saying it’s 1000$/g?!?
Am I tired or are these numbers just completely bonkers?
I don’t care if it’s the purest shit, that is insane.
Yeah, reported.
And I fucking quote myself in my comment above
distinction between foss and open source.
You said the comment in which I gave the fucking definition of Foss as written by the people who wrote the very definition of Foss was not foss.
You just gave me a link within the link that gives the definition of Foss about what Foss isn’t.
It isn’t me that needs to read better.
Go away.
Really? Lol. You replied with a link from the same site which is linked within the page I posted. Look at the screenshot.
Jfc, I’m done with you.
You said what I posted was not Foss.
It came from the very essence of Foss.
It gave the very definition of Foss.
From the people who started Foss movement .
On the site run by the people who continue to promote and advocate for Foss.
And explains the distinction between Foss and open source.
What about that is unclear?
Post something else about open souce, please.
Tell me again how that is not what Foss is.
Please, guide me.
(What you cleverly replied with is in the link I posted ffs)
From itsfoss
It’s foss
https://itsfoss.com/what-is-foss/
Because GNU is Foss because Foss is gnu. Because the guy that started the fsf movement is Richard stallman who wrote that.
They’re all wealthy and powerful and all are, at least in part, responsible for the decay, disorder, and collapse of society?
*am I wrong?
Those are just jumbo color pencils.