Oh, they use it to gain goodwill, attract talent, and get free labour. It’s no secret. Zuckerberg openly talks about this.
I wouldn’t call it bait though. They’re legitimately good projects, and you’re free to make use of them while giving nothing back.
I only know honeypots to be something used to bait out illegal activities, so I don’t know what you mean by that.
Surely, you don’t think the CEO making 50k a year managing a small business needs to be on the chopping block.
Point being?
I’m sure the guy can tell the difference between a genuine threat and a hyperbole.
Last I heard, their profits were nearly entirely from memberships. This was probably five years ago though. I don’t know if their numbers have changed since.
Exclusively open source? Otherwise, you’ll spare Zuckerberg too. Facebook has given us a bunch of really cool open source projects.
Those who can’t work are just as important. They’re made to suffer as an example to make sure those who can work never stop working.
It sounds dumb, but if the footage was on tape and not easily seekable, then I can see that happening.
There’s trash talking in the other direction that can be equally savage. Ever been to a research talk where someone raises their hand and says “actually, this is all trivial”? The worst thing you can hear after you spend months working your ass off on a project.
It’s in Fredericton. It’s so tiny, I don’t know if I can even call that place a city.
I prefer Arch Linux over the Golden Arches. It’s much better for your health.
Well, that explains the name “hamburger helper”. I’ve been wondering what they had in common with hamburgers besides the ground beef.
I can confirm that this works. Outside temperatures are right around freezing right now. Indoors, we’re still hovering at around 23C and we have yet to turn on any heating. I wouldn’t call this unethical though. Homes are built this way by design so that you share the heating.
Last I heard, farmers make a ton of money on average. It’s just tough work and your work/income is at the whims of the weather.
If you cook, you cook for a purpose, you don’t throw food away just because you’ve cooked for the sake of cooking, you eat it, or serve it to someone else to eat. In the end it’s a chore fulfilled still.
There’s overlap, but not necessarily. If I’m cooking for fun, I’ll cook things that are tasty and that I (or whoever I’m cooking for) would enjoy eating. I won’t be paying attention to the nutritional content of the food. But if I’m cooking for sustenance, then nutritional value comes first before enjoyment of the process or the food. Sometimes, you have to do both for one meal.
Living in Canada. Very few of the gardens in my neighbourhood have grass. It’s not as uncommon as you think.
What are these Manjaro controversies?
Ads don’t work on me CMV
Though it’s probably because advertisers never promote things I actually want.
I imagine they would have the same eating experience as those mini shrimps commonly used in Chinese cooking. Meaning, great tasting but very unpleasant texture due to the shell.