“You look like a guy I saw in an episode of Rick and Morty” Smile “Elon Tusk?” “No Mr Poopy Butthole”
“You look like a guy I saw in an episode of Rick and Morty” Smile “Elon Tusk?” “No Mr Poopy Butthole”
You can balance it adjusting the rocket nozzle
Assuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption
Very useful rules, I see… impossible to bypass :-)
Quite unusual, was it pure? As far as I know they always mix it with other nasty stuff beig it an excellent polar solvent
Interesting, you just replaced losers and clueless in the gervaise principle
https://thepowermoves.com/the-gervais-principle-summary-review/
Why not rich assholes? Is actually fitting to a very large majority
Or rich psychopaths
Km is 103m cm is 10-2m so the difference is 105 i.e. 100000 (one with 5 zeroes)
Or more intuitively one centi-meter is a 1/100 of a meter and Kilo-Meter is 1000 meter therefore 100*1000 100000
It is quite intuitive, once you start using it
What’s weird is why we don’t use Megameters and megagrams (i.e. one metric ton)
We should slowly invest and push for transition, but the current status quo is for early adopters and enthusiasts IMO
Nope,it’s a problem in many other scenarios
If i ride to vacation to a country with no charging infrastucture, if I want to ride to the mountains where it is subzero and my range drops dramatically, if I go to a place where it’s 38 deree celsius and I need AC my range is pretty much fucked up… (not to mention that close to remote places like cool beaches there is no charging station)
If I want to have a road trip… i suddenly becomes a planning issue
There are still so many things that are complicated by having a EV, and I don’t need the extra complications
The taxes should be an exponential function of the income, no tax brackets
I never understood why it isn’t like that
At least a quadratic or cubic function
But that’s about the local temperature of the year, it says nothing about the glaciers shrinking or expanding, also if glaciers are shrinking, wouldn’t we lose some readings? I mean if the glacier this year is smaller than last year, means that we have lost at least one year readings (most likely much more than that), not to mention that it contradicts that ice gets deposited every year.
It is my understanding that glaciers expand and shrink seasonally every year, and lately the expansion (if any) is always smaller than the shrinking, but it is a trend that started more than 100y ago (basically since when we started keeping record) and has been accellerating, because of this how can you extrapolate when to start dating in reverse? If you never saw a the, let’s call it inflationary phase, how do you know when it reversed? The error might be small… or not
Is there an error in my reasoning (or my assumptions)? Consider that I am not the only one having this doubts.
anyhow do you know the answer? Because I’d have a ton of questions, since the argument is complex and I don’t like the hand-wavy argument “well he expert say so”
Experts, scientists, luminaries in their field were prescribing lobotomies to mentally ills and castrations to gay people less than 100 years ago, so yes please always listen to the experts, but keep doubting their answers
All climatologist on this thread, please raise your hand
If you see the number of down votes, for pointing out something that is worth keeping into account, I’d say that is what is “not allowing”
I concede that maybe it’s just my impression
Well reread what I wrote and what you wrote, I think it’s pretty obvious
From saying “if it was shrinking before it might not be related too human activities” you went full “how are you alive in 2024…” And answered as if I was denying the god revealed truth
That’s a Taliban mentality at work, you don’t discuss the truth
If you can’t see it, I can’t show it to you
BTW do you have the power to ban me? If you don’t then, what are you discussing about silencing and banning?
There is a huge difference between a private owner, and a corporation. Anyhow they might have a common approach, I would say estate ownership should be limited to a certain number through incremental taxation the more you own the larger the tax bracket, like we do for income