That’s my thought, that it’s essentially pulled into the poison glad sac
That’s my thought, that it’s essentially pulled into the poison glad sac
Why is there a quote by a guy that loved arguing below it, kind of undermines the message.
It’s called functional literacy, which is what’s being talked to here. Also, your anecdote fails to address other possibilities. I have a friend that, under stress of a new location, may lose the ability to read menus, and their literacy matches other academics in their field. I am a reader that cannot read aloud because that is an entirely different skill than reading.
Somehow this comment replied to the wrong one, oops!
I assumed they were basically reverse snake fangs
It’s called functional literacy, which is what’s being talked to here. Also, your anecdote fails to address other possibilities. I have a friend that, under stress of a new location, may lose the ability to read menus, and their literacy matches other academics in their field. I am a reader that cannot read aloud because that is an entirely different skill than reading.
Okay then why am I accused of it while not qualifying. Seems like that’s not how it’s used by liberals, almost like this isn’t the colloquial definition
Illiterate refers to both being able to read basic words all the way up to reading comprehenson. Equally possible he simply cannot understand what he reads and is anti-intellectual as that seems to be on the rise in the US.
No, boomers do still own most things.
No dont go after my polycule too :(
Was this meant to reply to my comment?
Life is suffering
Asking a capitalist what the best path forward is for the US is like a black man asking a Klansman for career advice. They want to see us destitute, not be better.
What does good person mean in this context? Last I checked you can’t be an lgbt refugee there.
Nice do you take lgbt refugees or no like every other country
Once in a generation means within the lifespan of a generation, not till a new generation is born.
Name one person prostituting for $5 that is in a stable living situation.
Haha vandalizing someones property when they’re in an unstable living situation, lol this is so funny.
I am not a lawyer and do not know legal law, but I do know that a verbal contracts are legally binding and do not impede upon free speech. This would be a case similar to that. They want to say they will do everything to get something done, I want to see them immediately removed from office for doing shit that counters it.
My point does not in any way interact with FPTP and is not an instead of. All I’m saying is we should legally define what promises you can make on the campaign and hold people accountable for lying to constitutents.
So these would be a false flag in which direction?