Is #prolife blacklisted as well?

To some extent it’s just a representation of people who wear a beanie for functionality vs looks.

I think i agree to the concept but probably in the opposite direction of him. Get some people in there who could care less about killing ceos. Who any going to focus on the meaningless issues, who give us real news and not clickbait.

If you had transition surgery and therefor you couldn’t make use of a urinal, could you make the argument that the bathrooms are not fair and equal for you and therefor unconstitutional?

I*

Have bad allergies, those days are not often. Also sucks because people always think I am sick but thankfully a dumb immune system is not contagious.

Why do they have to be micro though?

This made me think a little in the opposite direction as well, of the male being the victim, has there been any documented recourse there? I have no clue what I even think of that situation. Interested in other people’s opinion.

Zom 100 did multi colored splatters and I think that was much more fun and not cum looking than this. Also very weird thing to censor, like does it being red vs white seriously change anything?

I am by no means disagreeing. I am just saying there is an argument that could be made better. Asking a reason for traveling or verifying passports in absolutely nothing new and makes the point the user is trying to make seem disingenuous to a degree. Also a personal reasoning as to why they would like more privacy in the modern era would make the post much more relatable.

I don’t think you pointed out the reason why you care? Also some of those things are not anything new so are not at all supportive of the point you try to make.

No he is not and he clearly states that. You clearly didn’t read the comment, just glanced at it.

Source?

At a glance thought it was one of those raising nylons but this is way more impressive.

Sure two additional cases not that bad, now just keep adding them up. Like anything security related it’s not 100% perfect you just have to make it annoying to break.

Fun fact not only to captchas monitor your input but also can analyze how you input it. If you mouse moves in a perfectly straight line if all your key presses are precisely spaced, you are probably not human.

I don’t think it’s that impractical or impossible to avoid almonds over other nuts.

So you won’t eat honey but will eat almonds, even though both are exploiting honey bees? Is because of it being a direct product vs a indirect product of honeybees. Is an in between layer where you draw your line?

One major honey bee related event every year is the mass migration of hives to pollinate almonds. Do exploitation of animals such as this affect your morals. If honey is considered a exploitation of honey bees I would also consider pollination another by-product of honey bee exploitation.

My wife is a PhD candidate studying honeybees so I trust her when I asked the question and the effects of honeybees on the environment are a tradeoff like everything in the world is but generally positive.

To mirror the honey bee conversation, soybeans replace native prarie lands throughout the Midwest. Soybeans hurt the environment so therefor they should not be supported. But to support our population we need massive food production. So it’s just not reasonable to avoid.

A massive population is really the root cause of almost all environmental issues imo. We have to blow so many things up to a high scale to support it and a self regulating population does not have the tools and responsibility for the massive reduction impact that is needed. Real change comes from an institutional level.

To the point of feral hogs at one point you mentioned the destruction of agriculture, I guess I was leaving the assumption open that feral hogs were destroying crops as the reason for the killings not them just being feral. I guess I am mainly raising the question of if your morals ever involve eating meat if it is killed under your ethical compass or if you consider the eating portion unethical in itself.