I guess I’m not entirely convinced that states need to be represented at all.
If we compare a voter in California to a voter in Wyoming, the person in Wyoming has a much stronger influence in the Senate and the judicial branch given that justices are confirmed soely by the Senate. Why should one voter have more power than another? Seems arbitrary to me.
Conversely, with a Senate the least populous states drag everyone else around by having a disproportionate amount of voting power in the Senate, just because of the state they happen to be in.
But that’s on the employer, right? Shitty employers want you think it’s your responsibility as a customer to ensure a fair wage.
The employer that is paying the shitty wage wants you to feel this way.
This is a bad analogy. This isn’t like running a business. Voters don’t have a lot of choice over the product, they just have their vote. We have two choices (effectively) and some will reject a candidate over a single issue when the consequences are much broader.
Caring for others doesn’t require religion.
It’s Victoria 2.