Can you evaluate the directory tree of a tar without decompressing? Not sure if gzip/bzip2 preserve that.
Can you evaluate the directory tree of a tar without decompressing? Not sure if gzip/bzip2 preserve that.
Turns out IBM is three hot messes in a trenchcoat and always has been.
International, business, and machines?
Ah, how could I have forgotten the legion of MSFT contract employees scouring… fucking… furaffinity for that sweet, delectable anti-Linux propaganda lmao
Because Microsoft cares so much about an 18.6K-member community called “linuxmemes” on a small federated Reddit alternative known for being filled with die-hard Linux fans and furries?
I’ve never really thought about this before, but const volatile
value types don’t really make sense, do they? const volatile
pointers make sense, since const
pointers can point to non-const
values, but const
values are typically placed in read-only memory, in which case the volatile
is kind of meaningless, no?
The share size doesn’t matter.
Gotta disagree with you there. Market adoption should be a primary concern of those who care about the Linux ecosystem.
Just absolutely demolish the toilet every time you use it.
Make them suck out that half-a-ply-ass-TP with oil rig equipment.
That’s… exactly what you do. macOS software is usually distributed in DMG files (compressed disk images). You download the DMG, open it (with a double click in Finder), then drag and drop the APP file to your Applications folder (or wherever else you want it to be).
Speaking of APP files, the structure of macOS apps is vastly superior to that of Windows, imo. Linux generally has them both beat, but there’s some additional complexity there.
I mean, I had to do some weird dragging to install an application!?
Ah yes, the notoriously unintuitive feature known as… drag and drop.
They certainly don’t mean your Amex lol