Pspspspspsps
Pspspspspsps
The Somme has enetered the chat.
The other side of that coin is that the poor have to buy from the rich, and the rich have bigger profit margins when selling cheaper items to the poor. This is exploitation of a captive market.
While the above is absolutely true, the rich are rich because of generational wealth. And if you go back far enough, that generational wealth is based on exploitation, environmental abuse, genocide, all the hits.
Not a figure of speech. It’s the difference between substantially accurate and propaganda.
Okay so we’re talking about the difference between “All squares are rectangles” and “Not all rectangles are squares.”
What you initially said, and what I offered a “conservative/Nazi” counterpoint to, is “Rectangles doing square things is such a rectangle thing to do,” when most rectangles are not squares.
This is the epitome of a straw man argument.
So would you say that the statement “Conservatives marching down the street carrying Nazi flags is such a conservative thing to do” is substantially true or substantially false?
Maybe a better distinction would be “accurate or misleading”.
Conservatives marching down the street carrying Nazi flags is such a conservative thing to do then, yes?
So is it “liberals” doing “such a liberal thing to do” or only what “ultralibs” who “are a rarity” do?
Those are different. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth.
No, no, no. You don’t get to pretend that what you originally said was something else entirely.
Liberals saying they support unions and strikes, and then complaining about strikes interrupting commerce and shipping for their own entitled reasons is such a liberal thing to do.
Those types of ultralibs aren’t well liked even in liberal circles, and they are a rarity.
Your first comment was a blanket statement. Your second comment tried to walk that back into a very specific statement. Those are two entirely different things, and your pretending they aren’t instead of admitting you were wrong in the first case is telling.
Leave some straw for the rest of us.
I can edit too:
Okay so we’re talking about the difference between “All squares are rectangles” and “Not all rectangles are squares.”
What you initially said, and what I offered a “conservative/Nazi” counterpoint to, is “Rectangles doing square things is such a rectangle thing to do,” when most rectangles are not squares.
This is the epitome of a straw man argument.
At least it wasn’t also behind one of those asinine display doors that has a screen on it telling you what might be inside.
Interesting. Sodium hydroxide.
Well, while I don’t use Dawn, I do use dishwashing liquid, whatever happens to be in the house, and I’ve never had a bit of trouble with it.
That means your car’s politics have shifted too far to the left. Schedule an appointment with the dealer to have it recentered.
They key with cast iron is using enough fat, which is generally more than you’d use with other cookware. High heat just burns the fat and/or the food, ruining your meal and making cleanup more difficult.
What cast iron is really good at in terms of heat is retaining it. There’s enough mass that you have to preheat the pan for longer, but once it’s hot, it stays at a pretty stable temperature when you add your ingredients. It doesn’t get hot spots as severly, either, especially if preheated for a good long time at a relatively low heat.
Pyongyang Oblast is best Oblast.
Use “soap” if you want. Modern dishwashing liquid doesn’t have lye in it. It’s the lye from old school rendered soap that damages the seasoning.
Don’t use anything with an abrasive more than the rough side of a sponge, and even with that, don’t rub super hard or in the same place for too long.
Dude looks like “What a windfall! Now I don’t have to commit murder, I can just not try very hard here.”
Elonald Trusk