3·
3 days agoMoreover alcoholic and non alcoholic is generally a hard line separation so children and whatnot don’t have any real reason to be around there.
- 0 Posts
- 654 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Sure, this is adjudicated though there’s absolutely zero question to it at this point.
No one said they did.
Correct, the jury instructions are public and literally all of that is in it.
I’m not even quite sure what your point is.
I don’t need to answer questions you can’t explain the pertinence of. What’s next my mothers maiden and next of kin. Bank account number? Where do we draw the line on inane requests we can’t explain the purpose of, the fact you haven’t kinda of proves my point.
You still can’t explain why my class makes my argument more or less factual or relevant. The only way that could be true is if wealth determines correctness, again deliciously ironic.
You can’t admit you were insensitive so of course I’m a rich asshole, you’re not a dickhead I’m just too rich to understand your struggle. Gotcha, you’re the victim not the people being factually bought and sold. Neat, moving on unless you have something worthwhile to say though I won’t hold my breath.
Avoid again.
How does it matter?
Also and I say again, point to where I’m dismissive of it. I have always maintained its fucked up, my issue is it’s not literally slavery.
This isn’t complex.
Even after I told you my economic situation.
Yeah that was dumb, I also don’t care if it’s true or not nor should anyone. Opinion isn’t weighed based on wealth nor is fact.
All you’ve done is expose yourself as a classist thug which is just deliciously ironic.
You say that but you post a lot here with photos from your own life and talk a lot about yourself. It isn’t particularly hard to put the clues together if that’s your particular proclivity. I’m a tedious asshole you are correct, but do not put yourself in danger like that guy Internet arguments aren’t worth run ins with motivated psychopaths.
Neat, you didn’t answer the important one. How does it change anything? How do you know I’m not a well spoken 7 year old and importantly what does it change? Like if I’m homeless what’s that mean? Billionaire? Making exactly enough to cover all my bills but no more?
Like I get it you think I’m so above needing money that i don’t get struggle which is imo a strange conclusion but whatever.
Well, I cannot possibly explain to you how unbelievably fucking dumb it is to doxx yourself but I will go ahead and report it for you.
Don’t doxx yourself guy.
Oxford dictionary
trouble or problems, especially in connection with what you need or would like yourself
We apologize for the delay and regret any inconvenience it may have caused.
So then, is it by definition an inconvenience. You may not like it being factual but it is.
a person who is owned by another person and is forced to work for and obey them
Not quite the same there huh? You know, what with the owned as property thing.
Again, is my class as perceived by you somehow altering the English language or basic human decency? No, then what does it matter. If we’re being classiest I know someone who’s posted pictures of their old world hardwood library bigger than a lot of folks living spaces. So if it matters, how rich are you?
It’s an inconvenience, the fact you can’t find another word but literal slavery implies it’s validity.
It could, but the fact you have equity in property is pretty good nigh definitive evidence that you are not in fact a slave.
It’s my argument any more or less valid based on what I make or what I’m worth? Tell me, how does it in fact change anything I’ve spoken about.
Inconveniences can be cruel boss, they’re not however slavery no matter how dramatic and indignate you choose to be.
You’re implying being owned and not being paid are analogous, they’re not.
No one owns your children, no one is going to whip you, you need not but your freedom if that’s even a possibility, you’re not in fact less than anyone else in a legal sense of personhood.
It’s not productive to be so hyperbolic especially when what you’re saying is incredibly offensive let alone to be indignate when someone tries to explain to you how downright cruel and insensitive you’re being.
It’s not at all the same thing since it’s not forcible.
it’s just fine and it doesn’t matter who suffers.
Point to where I said or implied anything of the sort.
It’s just incredibly cruel, especially to children who did nothing to deserve it.
Agreed, but things don’t need to be slavery to be shitty and the offensive hyperbole is both unnecessary and misleading.
Happy?
Yeah, though the indignation is curious.
Is it literally slavery?
I hate to tell you, that’s an inconvenience not literal slavery.
You must live a privileged life to compare forced servitude and plays at genetic inferiority to not getting paid.
Yes.
Try in a different and better way.
I don’t need to, you’re still defending your point which is that not getting paid is literally slavery.
Check yourself, no one is selling their children nor themselves down river. Like how is the fact it is objectively offensive to compare the two not altogether glaring to you?
They all get paid, they just might not be paid on time which is not in fact slavery.
That would be the point in guessing or better yet finding out on your own that they in fact did get paid because not paying people is fraud. Some agencies used their budget surplus to keep paying employees others like the TSA who are poorly managed so far as I’m aware have not.
If that’s your decision, it’s not one I would make though.
Everything you could really want to know about how shutdown pay works is in this PDF by the OPM.
No, I’m trying to get you to accept calling inconvenience slavery is a bit too far.
The TSA who say that literally Everytime? The TSA that doesn’t control their own payroll? That one?
2018
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-affect-air-travel/
Most TSA workers, about 95%, are considered essential, and would therefore remain on the job in the event of a shutdown — but without pay — TSA administrator David Pekoske said in a post on X.
Guess how many did not get paid.
2013
https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2015/02/25/tsa-workers-deserve-more-iou
A shutdown for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) means that most of our employees would still continue to come to work, without receiving a paycheck for that work until the shutdown ends.
Guess how many did not get paid.
A baited hook does not necessitate a bite, sometimes people just say shut to scare you and this is one of those times.
Notably, I can’t help but notice you aren’t calling it slavery anymore. Have we backed away from that ill thought out and obscenely offensive analogy?
Opm holds 90 days in reserve, appropriations usually issues another 90 if needed, add another 90 days by zero interest loan and you have pay for approximately 270 days.
Currently opm projects no non payment, stop doomsaying when this happens periodically like clockwork.
Ed: also distinctly different from slavery given the voluntary nature of employment. It’s bad, it isn’t however “literally slavery” no matter how hard you clutch your pearls.
They’ve never not been paid, doing otherwise is fraud even for the government.
And no, that’s not slavery. Slavery is a forced servitude, you’re not a slave because your mom asked you to take out the trash for “$20 next week if finances work out”.
Not the everything is literally slavery or literally Hitler no matter how hard you wring your hands and stir the pot.
Federal employees would receive backpay after the shutdown ends.
Slaves have to work bud, employees choose to. You could just say your hyperbole is a bit much rather then insist gainfully employed people are actual slaves anymore than any of the test of us wage slaves.
Ed:
Also if you read up there are programs specially for this because it’s so absurd and common. https://www.ussfcu.org/federal-government-shutdown-assistance.html
USAA and Navy Federal offer the same zero interest loans as well.
They get paid, I’m not sure your intention with this random hyperbolic doomsaying is but it’s unproductive and misleading at best.
That’s not how this works.
Shutdown doesn’t mean no pay, it means no check issued for non essentials. You get furloughed and don’t work unless you choose to, everyone that is expected to work is covered by supplemental budget.
Weirder still the ones that do show up tend to cast votes of absentees with sticks they proudly carry around for just that age or somehow both accepted and legal.