Textbook communism is an ideal utopia that can never be achieved.
Textbook communism is an ideal utopia that can never be achieved.
Non 0 amount of suffering is a meaningless statement.
If it was just plural the whole time it would only be they them. It only works if you track one individual from egg onwards.
No, social behavior has always been a party of biology. Even after you reproduce how you care for your young and your extended family has a huge impact on the species. Herd animals or anything that flocks can’t function solo. If all the adults just left after they reproduced the species wouldn’t survive. Reproduction is key for the individual, but it’s never that simple. The version you’re told in school is always a highly simplified version of the truth.
Either way you would run into the problem of having a huge amount of your calories come from alcohol, without any nutrients. Unless you’re just drinking beer, which is just liquid bread.
Well that’s not really in there, he is often described as an adversary. But it is notable that there are many times where he is used by god in a necessary way.
It’s the same idea as the actual Satan in the bible who is mostly just a dude given tasks by god to tempt people.
Your brain is always filtering stuff, that’s a thing.
I assume you would only do that on like a sample document for a client or a draft, specifically so it won’t be used in an actual court.
Serious trucks are duallies and haul big trailers.
Fred Durst isn’t a bad singer, he did a pretty good cover of behind blue eyes. Looking at reviews it wasn’t super popular but I thought it was decent.
You won’t have general purpose true AI until it can actually think and reason, llm will never do that. At most they would be a way of interaction with an AI.
For basic stuff like rice the US produces way more than it needs, the only real imports I see are for specialty stuff like jasmine rice or bhasmati rice from Thailand or India. Basic long grain rice or calrose is domestic and very cheap.
The dollar is internal and farmers make annual purchases so they will have already bought their stuff they need for this season so they shouldn’t be too affected by exchange rates. The US makes its own oil and derivatives like fertilizer and farm equipment so they shouldn’t be too affected for now.
For this current season specifically there will be a glut of food and not enough buyers. In the future if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase.
There is more supply than needed, we normally make so much we export huge quantities. How does restricted food exports increase prices domestically?
The comments about capitalism and price gouging and stuff are all fine and correct. But that would logically apply whether the exports were restricted or not. But they have to do something with all the food they were going to export or not. Sometimes they’ll just burn it or dump milk but they can probably sell, just at a lower price or pay more to ship it farther away. Now long term yes if these farmers go out of business then prices could increase if the supply shrinks but that doesn’t really apply to this year.
The problem with the reasoning I see here is that you lot are taking things you heard and applying them to this situation, but you just say capitalism and that’s the end of your argument. Supply and demand still affect prices, especially on a large scale and with commodity goods.
Quality maybe but there’s no reason domestically produced food should go up a lot. The fact that China refused tons of pork and soy beans imports from America means there will be a glut and that means terrible finances for farmers but hardly expensive food.
Most food in the US is domestically produced, so no. The US is a huge exporter of food outside of specialty goods and tropical things.
Yeah, but that’s just an attempt at something like communism. They didn’t reach full communism.