From the article:

In other words, it’s fine to defend vigilantes when they kill unarmed Black people or anti-racist activists, but when a CEO’s life is taken, we must solemnly stay silent on the reasons why such a person might be targeted or why bystanders might not be crying.

I didn’t notice this before reading your comment, but now I can’t unsee this

Yeah I feel the same, I was just joking

2034: The Vatican unveils official furry mascot