• fakir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Thanks again!

    In other words, Market Socialism is nice in that it removes exploitation, but is no nearer to Communism than Capitalism. The leap to public ownership is no closer, just the relations of exploitation are removed. How do we get to Communism, and what role can worker cooperatives play in that? The solution is to perform a revolution and establish a Proletarian State. This is a hard requirement to begin with, otherwise you can’t simply accomplish Market Socialism, the bourgeoisie would never allow it.

    Right, so market socialism is better than capitalism, and I’m arguing it is easier to get there than revolution. I’m also kinda arguing that market socialism will naturally lead to everyone just donating their belongings to the greater good once everyone is content with what they get from market socialism, otherwise I see it impractical to simply snatch private assets for public ownership. Lastly, I agree it would seem like the bourgeoise would never allow it, but things like Linux and the fediverse exist and they’ll only get stronger and harder to beat with network effect.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I guess I have to ask, why do you think Market Socialism is easier than revolution, and if so, why hasn’t that happened? Same with the idea of people just donating to the greater good, in a system surrounding competition?

      There’s a difference between FOSS and production, where industrial Capital can cost billions.