So in the new upcoming major feature update for IOS, Apple is adding RCS support in there messaging app. What are the privacy implications of adopting RCS?

Is there any other apps that have RCS support on Android other than Google’s own messaging app?

The reason for my asking is because I was considering migrating my relatives’ messaging app to a RCS supported one because they will probably most likely enjoy the extra bandwidth of RCS.

Note, they’re already using Signal, Telegram, and WhatsApp for most of their conversations.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Signal, being owned by a nonprofit has a bit more resistance to that than most.

      That’s the main reason I recommend it over alternatives with similar technical capabilities, such as WhatsApp.

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Any good app/product that becomes very popular will be inevitably acquired by an evil company at some point. That’s why the default cannot be good.

      • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        But don’t you just get tired of jumping through hoops for every little thing these days?

        Big tech needs to stop being evil. There, problem solved, right…right…ha

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          But don’t you just get tired of jumping through hoops for every little thing these days?

          Do you know that everything in the universe has a price so it stays balanced? Same goes to this. You either deal with it (spend effort) or switch to a worse (evil) option where you pay with your data (much more valuable thing) to get more consistency.

          Big tech needs to stop being evil.

          Not gonna happen. Even if you put highly moral or religious people on the management, someone will find a way to ruin it. The bigger the project gets, the bigger effort bad actors will be ok with taking to take over it. The xz vulnerability is the perfect example. The bad actor there spent like 2 years to get trust of the main developer.

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s also the government that can force them to add some PhotoDNA or backdoor related stuff, as well as give them some mandatory-to-note “suggestions”. It will be hard to hide it because it’s an open-source project but the server side is not and the government may just ban the app altogether.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Still, a decentralized protocol, not a platform, would have a much easier time circumventing stupid laws like this, as well as censorship.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                If you want to argue about their centralized nature, we can, and I will agree, but that’s not what we were discussing.