gedaliyah@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAutomationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square163linkfedilinkarrow-up11.85Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.84Karrow-down1imageAutomationlemmy.worldgedaliyah@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square163linkfedilink
minus-squarealcedine@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up37arrow-down2·1 year ago“Machine learning” is perfectly cromulent. The bias is what it learned, because that’s what it was taught. (Not intentionally, I don’t think. It’s just hard to get this stuff right sometimes.)
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down2·1 year agoJob interviews are all bias regardless of whether they’re automated 😅
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m really good at my job. But that’s not why I got my job, it’s just a coincidence. I got my job because I’m pretty good at interviews.
minus-squarestormeuh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt is bias laundering though. They hide behind an “objective” algorithm, which was trained on a huge dataset of past biased hiring decisions.
“Machine learning” is perfectly cromulent. The bias is what it learned, because that’s what it was taught. (Not intentionally, I don’t think. It’s just hard to get this stuff right sometimes.)
Job interviews are all bias regardless of whether they’re automated 😅
I’m really good at my job.
But that’s not why I got my job, it’s just a coincidence.
I got my job because I’m pretty good at interviews.
Garbage in garbage out
Garbage all around
It is bias laundering though. They hide behind an “objective” algorithm, which was trained on a huge dataset of past
biasedhiring decisions.