• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not a contradiction. Your, my, and everyone’s bed is for sleeping in. The beds in that store are for accumulation of wealth. This displays the harsh efficiencies of capitalism, because the people in the most need for a bed cannot afford to have one.

    • dwalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I belive the beds in a store that sells beds are either to be sold or to help you choose a bed. They are not “fuck you, see how many beds i have” beds

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The beds in that store are for accumulation of wealth

      …selling people beds so they have beds to sleep in. Beds that aren’t riddled with bugs thanks to the store not being a homeless shelter.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re assuming selling beds is the only method to distribute them. That’s simply untrue.

        • bioemerl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Best method we have found so far. If you want cookie cutter efficient ass state made beds you can move off to the… Well, every state who has tried has collapsed so you’re shit out of luck.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean like the still-existing and highly complex gift economies of natives all across the globe that have no homelessness?