• kescusay@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    For the record, folks: Deadnaming a trans person will earn you an instant, permanent ban.

    You may now return to your regularly scheduled real-life-imitating-The-Onion content.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That seems like an easily made, honest mistake. I would hope context matters more.

      • solarbabies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        for real, I’m pro trans rights and I still sometimes accidentally deadname Elliot Page because I have dyscalculia. if you ban me for that aren’t you being ableist?

        also yes context is very important.

        if I say “when Caitlyn went by the name [X], and she used [Y] pronoun, [Z] thing happened to [Y]”, I assume I will still get banned for deadnaming even though I’m innocently adding clarity to a conversation.

        to make things worse, if someone is trans and gender fluid, and I call them by a name or pronoun they used last time I knew about them, now I’ve committed a crime of which I had no knowledge.

        this blanket condemnation of deadnaming is just dumb. it requires nuance.

        • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dyscalculia is a disability resulting in difficulty learning or comprehending arithmetic, such as difficulty in understanding numbers, learning how to manipulate numbers, performing mathematical calculations, and learning facts in mathematics. It is sometimes colloquially referred to as “math dyslexia”, though this analogy is misleading as they are distinct syndromes.[5]

          What does that have to do with deadnaming people? Don’t try to use a disability as a shield for shitty behavior.

          I assume I will still get banned for deadnaming even though I’m innocently adding clarity to a conversation.

          Yes because that’s still deadnaming, that information isn’t relevant and isn’t needed in context. It’s not necessary to dead name and misgender someone to talk about things they did before transition. It’s completely unnecessary, and in the context of your example you KNOW they don’t use that anymore so its actually worse.

          now I’ve committed a crime of which I had no knowledge.

          No you haven’t no one is going to get mad about simply not knowing a change has been made. Its when you KNOW what they prefer and yet you still deadname them.

          this blanket condemnation of deadnaming is just dumb. it requires nuance.

          No it doesn’t

          • solarbabies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            wow aren’t you just a ray of sunshine.

            what does that have to do with deadnaming people?

            I guess you’re the expert here since you Googled a condition & now you know everything there is to know about it, right?

            let me break it down. over 12 years ago when I was diagnosed, among the better-known symptoms like mixing up numbers, “misremembering names” (especially those that start with the same letter/sound) was a frequently published symptom of dyscalculia (and dyslexia, FWIW):

            fast forward to 2013, in the DSM-5 they changed the definition of dyslexia and dyscalculia, removed them as diagnoses and instead replaced them with a more general diagnosis: “Specific Learning Disorder”, which among other things now requires that a person is “unable to perform academically at a level appropriate to their intelligence and age.”

            in my opinion, and this is just my non-professional opinion:

            1. if I tell someone I have a “Specific Learning Disorder” they’ll generally have no idea what I’m talking about. it’s easier and feels more self-consistent to tell them the name of the condition I was diagnosed with, even if it’s outdated.

            2. the new DSM-5 diagnosis doesn’t account for people like me who were able to excel academically despite difficulty with numbers and names. did I have to read numbers 10+ times to make sure I knew I had the right one? yes. do I still struggle immensely to do basic arithmetic in my head? absolutely. am I also a software engineer who sometimes has to work with numbers? yes. did I get straight A’s in all my math classes? yes. people with dyslexia and dyscalculia excel all the time by discovering and using their own coping mechanisms, so this diagnosis seems overly reductive to me.

            again, I’m not a professional. is it possible that my symptoms which were previously attributed to dyscalculia are just a part of my ASD? sure. but I’m pretty sure if I said I have trouble remembering Elliot Page’s name because I’m autistic, people still wouldn’t know what I was talking about, and I’d have an even harder time explaining it. so there you go.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      See? They’re just gonna turn this place into reddit no matter what. lemmy’s gonna end up just as shitty as that. Petty fascists ruining everything. Fuck off with this stupidity. And the fact that this is posted with unironic intention is absolutely stunning, honestly it does read like an Onion headline so i guess kudos for that but like, what are you even doing having power here, missing so fundamental a point as this? its just embarrassing… The Onion itself would fire you

      • Glytch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The Onion doesn’t deadname people either, because they’re decent people. You just want to be transphobic because you think it’s edgy.