I’d replace collecting food stamps for collecting heads.

What kind of information could he obtain if he had intentions of spying?

You’re assuming way too much about my motives. I haven’t even stated a conclusion. But from what I gather, you think our behavior is (almost?) fully formed from external forces. That’s a valid take, but, I believe to be highly debatable, which I have no answer or conclusion for.

Yeah there’s no way this idiot is a high genius.

A full potato salad of Karens

Well, let’s hope the great filter isn’t something we encounter before we see some cool shit.

Thanks man. So this guy is an expert on economies but not on psychologies. Is that fair?

Is it always a linear path?

It’s an unanswerable question. Just something to think about. My intention was to ponder how much external forces dictate our society rather than the internal expressive ones.

Your words make no sense to me. If you want to convey ideas use the common tongue. It feels like you have some neat ideas though.

Edit: Can anyone please decipher what this guy said?

If you ran humanity in thousands of simulations how often would we end up in the same capitalistic situation?

You’ve got to entangle the same machine first over a massive macro quantum space-time superposition.

“Don’t you fucking tread on me while I tread on you!”

Heh, Trump reeks of used car salesman energy.

Doesn’t the new wording also include monetary exchange as well. Wouldn’t that mean they could sell your data at anytime even if they are currently not?

They’re the same picture!

Just erotic. Nothing kinky. It’s the difference between using a feather and using a chicken. -pratchett

I’d take some less evil, please.

“what does it matter what another stupid monkey thinks of me?”

The joke is so old a minor would’ve died by old age by now